Actor rape case trial in trouble after prosecutor steps down

When contacted, A. Sureshan, who submitted his resignation to the Additional Chief Secretary of the Kerala government, said he would respond to the developments later.

November 23, 2020 02:20 pm | Updated November 24, 2020 06:06 am IST - KOCHI:

Kochi, Kerala, 14/03/2018 : Actor Dileep, key accused in the actor abduction case appears before the Ernakulam Principal Sessions Court on Wednesday. 
Photo: Special arrangement

Kochi, Kerala, 14/03/2018 : Actor Dileep, key accused in the actor abduction case appears before the Ernakulam Principal Sessions Court on Wednesday. Photo: Special arrangement

The legal and procedural crisis in the trial of the actor rape case has deepened with Special Public Prosecutor A. Sureshan stepping down from the post.

He submitted his resignation to the Additional Chief Secretary of the Kerala government on Monday.

The proceedings in the case had to be stopped for the past fortnight after the prosecution moved the High Court for a change of trial court raising allegations of bias against the Special Judge hearing the case.

As the proceedings resumed at the Additional Special Sessions Court (SPE/CBI)-3, Ernakulam, on Monday, Joseph Manalavan, the lawyer assisting the Public Prosecutor, handed over a statement to Honey M. Varghese, the Special Judge, stating that Mr. Sureshan has put in his papers.

“Mr. Sureshan has placed the resignation before the authority concerned and requested them to relieve him from the duties as the Special Public Prosecutor,” read the one-line statement that was submitted before the court.

When contacted, Mr. Sureshan said he would respond to the developments later.

Actor Dileep has been arraigned as the 8th accused in the case in which the woman actor was abducted and raped in a moving car.

Incidentally, the trial court had resumed the proceedings on the day after the Single Judge of the Kerala High Court rejected the application of the prosecution and the survivor in the rape and abduction case for a change of court. Though the prosecution and the victim had sought a change of court arguing that the trial court was acting in a biased manner, the High Court had rejected their plea.

With the information of the prosecutor stepping down reaching the trial court, the Special Judge directed the investigation officer in the case to make necessary arrangements for resuming the proceedings shortly. The case has been posted for November 26, considering the directions of the Supreme Court to complete the trial in the case on or before February 4, 2021, sources indicated.

On November 26, the investigation officer will have to submit a report to the court about the alternative arrangements made for resuming the trial.

If the State government accepts the resignation of the prosecutor and appoints a new one in his place, the new prosecutor would continue the proceedings from where his predecessor ended. Normally, the examination of new witnesses would continue as scheduled by the court and the re-examination of the earlier witnesses may be required only if some clarifications were required, legal sources indicated.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.