Soumya case: Death for convict

November 11, 2011 01:13 pm | Updated August 02, 2016 05:23 pm IST - Thrissur

Nine months after the gruesome rape and murder of Soumya shocked society’s conscience, the Thrissur Fast Track Court awarded death sentence to Govindachamy, the lone convict in the case.

According to the prosecution, Govindachamy, had pushed Soumya, 23, an employee with a private firm in Kochi, out of the Ernakulam-Shoranur passenger train (56608) on February 1 after attempting to rob her. He raped the seriously injured woman in woods nearby the railway track at Vallathole Nagar. She succumbed to injuries at the Thrissur Government Medical College Hospital on February 6.

Pronouncing the verdict on Friday Thrissur Fast Track Court K. Raveendra Babu said the planning of the accused in the case was diabolic and the execution was brutal.

Govindachamy was also sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 376 of IPC with a fine of Rs. 1 lakh. In default, he has to undergo simple imprisonment for two years.

The court also sentenced him to seven years of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1000 under Section 394 read with 397 IPC. He was further sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of three months under Section 447 of IPC. The multiple sentences shall run concurrently.

The death sentence under Section 302 of IPC was subjected to the confirmation of the High Court. The fine amount should be given to the legal heirs of the deceased as compensation.

The Judge said the brutal rape was one of the reasons for the death of Soumya.

“There is no legal or moral justification for the act of the accused. The nature of the crime was savage. Society’s conscience was completely shaken by the murder,” he said.

Soumya was in the hospital for six days on ventilator support in a vegetative state. Soumya’s pituitary gland was ruptured as the accused smashed her head against the wall of the train compartment when she resisted, the Judge noted.

“Govindachamy is habitual offender, who had already been convicted in eight cases [in Tamil Nadu]. This indicates that he is a menace to the society and is incapable of rehabilitation,” he added.

Defense lawyer said he would approach the High Court against the verdict of the Fast Track Court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.