Police protection for 10 more Muthoot branches in Kerala

HC directs management to attend conciliatory meetings

September 19, 2019 11:40 pm | Updated September 20, 2019 11:13 am IST - Kochi

George Alexander Muthoot, managing director of Muthoot Finance among a section of his employees whol hold a demo in front of the NBFC's corporate office on Banerjee Road, Kochi, defending their right to work as another section of employees are on a strike on Sept. 3, 2019.

George Alexander Muthoot, managing director of Muthoot Finance among a section of his employees whol hold a demo in front of the NBFC's corporate office on Banerjee Road, Kochi, defending their right to work as another section of employees are on a strike on Sept. 3, 2019.

A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on Thursday ordered that if any obstruction is caused to those employees who are willing to work in the ten branches of Muthoot Finance Limited, the police shall interfere and remove such obstructions.

The Bench headed by Justice Vinod Chandran made it clear that the order would not interfere with the right of the striking workers to peacefully carry on their protest against the management without causing any obstruction to the smooth functioning of the branches.

The order was passed on a writ petition filed by managers of the branches at Illikkal in Kottayam, Erattupetta, Kanjirappally, Athani near Nedumbassery, Vandanmedu, Pachalam in Ernakulam, Thodupuzha, Poonjar, Kattapana, and Mangatukadavu in Thodupuzha. The managers sought police protection for operating their branch offices.

Court directives

The court also directed the management to ensure that it duly participated in the conciliation meetings.

The Bench also asked the management to ensure that none other than the persons in the muster roll of a branch shall be employed in a particular branch.

The State Attorney earlier submitted that the management was not cooperating with the conciliation meetings initiated by the State authorities. This was despite the fact that the management had itself sought initiation of conciliation proceedings and the court during the hearing of the petition suggested mediation in the matter.

Petitioners’ claim

According to the petitioners, members of the Non-banking and Private Finance Employees’ Association (CITU) and the CITU State unit were preventing the petitioners from entering their offices by force.

The dispute between the trade union and the management was not a ground to deny the right of the petitioners to earn their livelihood through employment. The right to strike did not involve the right to obstruct employees willing to work. Despite lodging complaints with the police, no action had been taken to provide police protection, the petitioners contended.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.