Paul Muthoot case: HC sets aside life term of 8 accused

The second accused in the case did not file an appeal

September 05, 2019 07:45 pm | Updated 07:45 pm IST - KOCHI

A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on Thursday set aside the Thiruvananthapuram CBI Special Court’s order convicting and awarding life imprisonment to eight accused in the sensational case relating to the murder of Paul Muthoot George.

However, the sentence and conviction imposed on the accused on charges of unlawful assembly and voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means and other charges would remain in force.

A total of nine accused were awarded life term and asked to pay a fine of ₹50,000 each by the sessions court. The court did not consider the case of the second accused Satheesh Kumar alias Kari Satheesh, who stabbed Paul George, as he did not file an appeal.

The Bench comprising Justice A.M. Shaffique and Justice N. Anilkumar passed the verdict while partially allowing the appeal filed by accused Jayachandran of Payippad, Sathar of Thrikodithanam, Sujith of Payippad, Akash Sasidharan of Payippad, Satheesh Kumar of Payippad, Rajeev Kumar of Payippad, Shino Paul of Payippad and Faisal of Mannanchery against the sentences awarded to them by the sessions court.

The 32-year-old businessman Paul Muthoot George was stabbed to death in a road rage incident at Ponga, on the Alappuzha-Changanassery road at the night of August 21, 2009

The Bench observed that even though it could be said that there was an unlawful assembly, it could not be stated that the accused had entertained a common object at any point of time to commit murder.

The evidence itself proves beyond doubt that Paul had suffered injuries at the hands of Kari Satheesh. It was nothing but a cold-blooded murder, the court said adding that it was, however, not a planned crime. Everything started when the Ford Endeavour car hit on the motorcycle.

The accused were proceeding towards Mannandanam to commit another crime. They never knew that such an incident would happen en route. Without knowing as to who was driving the car or who was the occupant, the first accused suddenly asked some of them to chase the car.

Their intention was to use criminal force. Therefore, formation of an unlawful assembly at that time by accused two to eight had been established. All the accused initially had only the intention to beat the driver of the car, but they might not have the intention to commit murder as such.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.