Lawyers asked to keep off adalats

Bar association resolution follows HC circular on payment of accident claims

December 02, 2019 12:03 am | Updated 12:03 am IST - Thiruvananthapuram

The Thiruvananthapuram Bar Association seems to be finding itself increasingly at odds with the judiciary.

Close on the heels of an unresolved standoff with judicial officers over the alleged storming of a woman magistrate’s courtroom here last week, new information emerged on Sunday that the association had instructed its members to ‘abstain’ from adalats henceforth.

The Bar had adopted the resolution in the face of a circular by the High Court which lawyers felt had “adversely affected their rights.”

The High Court said Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) judges should ensure that insurance companies deposited accident claims in annuity schemes initiated in the name of victims rather than dispensing the whole amount directly to them through their lawyers.

Eliminating fake claims

It had also frowned upon parcelling out claims to victims directly as cash and said courts should resort to such a step only in exceptional circumstances. The High Court had, at a stroke, sought to eliminate fake claims and ease the stranglehold individual lawyers and police officers had over claimants.

The court had also strived to stymie “ambulance chasers,” mostly a motley group of corrupt police officers, touts and hospital staff who poached accident victims seeking damages for personal injury on behalf of individual lawyers.

The racketeers often took the lion’s share of the claims awarded to the accident victims by fudging records and cooking books. They also filed fake complaints to fleece insurance companies.

‘Financial loss’

A senior lawyer said the move would make legal practice financially unsustainable for a large segment of lawyers who faced spiralling establishment costs and a dwindling number of cases.

‘Not advisable’

However, a court official said the Bar’s decision appeared to run against the grain of the Supreme Court’s damning observation in early November that boycott of court proceedings by advocates was tantamount to “closure of the judiciary” and was not advisable in the larger interest of the public.

The High Court’s Legal Services Committee organised adalats regularly to reduce the pendency of cases and ensure that justice reached ordinary citizens.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.