Lavalin deal violated Central norms: CBI

Contract with SNC-Lavalin to modernise hydel projects

Updated - November 17, 2021 06:59 am IST

Published - September 10, 2013 03:12 am IST - Thiruvananthapuram:

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) told its special court here on Monday that the State government had contracted SNC- Lavalin, a Canadian firm, to renovate and modernise three hydroelectric power projects in the State in 1997 at a fixed price rate in contravention of repeated Union government directions, since 1993, to follow the process of competitive bidding in the implementation of power projects to ensure transparency and fair play in such deals.

Opposing the discharge pleas of the accused in the case, notably that of Communist Party of India (Marxist) State secretary and former Electricity Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, the CBI said the Union government had written to all State governments in November 1993 and again in January 1995 to shun the practice of unilaterally entering into Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with private players while implementing power generation projects “in the future.”

In a letter in April 1994, the Union government had warned the State government against pursuing the MoU route for power generation projects. The Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) could “not convincingly” explain why it gave the go-by to the Centre’s directions while entering into a contract with SNC-Lavalin to modernise Panniyar, Sengulam, and Pallivasal hydroelectric projects.

The CBI accused the suspects of splitting the contract with SNC-Lavalin into three components to circumvent the Central Electricity Authority’s direction that any power generation project that entailed a capital expenditure of more than Rs.100 crore required its clearance.

The CBI said that one of its witnesses, Radhakrishna Pillai, a retired KSEB official who was tasked to submit a status report on the three projects, had stated that SNC-Lavalin’s vice president Klaus Triendel, an accused in the case, and one Dilip Rahulan, purportedly a consultant for the Canadian firm, had prepared the cost estimate for the contract on their “laptops.” The CBI judge, R. Reghu, asked the CBI prosecutor to clarify whether it was in pursuance of the alleged conspiracy.

The CBI said the status report was an “eyewash,” having no bearing on the terms of the implementation contract, which had been decided as part of the conspiracy. The government entered into the contract with SNC-Lavalin the very day the report was submitted, the investigation agency said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.