Kerala High Court calls for status report of SIA of K-Rail

Court says Centre stated that it has no role in project implementation

July 26, 2022 08:35 pm | Updated July 27, 2022 11:47 am IST - KOCHI:

The Kerala High Court building in Ernakulam. File

The Kerala High Court building in Ernakulam. File | Photo Credit: H. Vibhu

The Kerala High Court has asked the government to inform the court of the present stage of the social impact assessment (SIA) survey being conducted for the SilverLine project.

Justice Devan Ramachandran passed the order when a batch of writ petitions against the survey came up for hearing. The court orally observed that the Central government had simply washed its hands of now, stating that it had no role to play in the implementation of the project.

The court observed that the importance of the statement by the Centre could not be lost sight of. The Centre had said in a statement that if the Kerala Railway Development Corporation Limited (K-Rail) was involved in the SIA survey and spent its own funds for it, such involvement and expenditure would be at its own risk and responsibility.

The Centre had submitted that the Railway Board had neither approved nor concurred with the SIA survey being conducted by the State government under the provision of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in the Land Acquisition Act.

As per the Act, when a State government was conducting an SIA, the Centre had no role in it. It also added that the Railways had not approved the project and, therefore, any action for acquisition of land taken by any authority was premature.

The court orally observed that projects of the magnitude of SilverLine could not be hurried or completed on war cries. The government should have been taken the people into confidence. The project was one that the State needed. However, K-Rail had acted in a hasty manner.

Muhammed Shah, counsel for one of the petitioners, said no further SIA could be taken forward since the six-month period of the notifications for the SIA had expired.

The court also recorded the undertaking of the government that large survey stones had not been used for the survey and that any activities with respect to the SIA, even if it continued, were being done only through geo-tagging.

The court also made it clear that the court had neither permitted nor stopped the SIA in any manner.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.