Kerala HC order allowing woman estranged from husband to terminate pregnancy draws praise

Court holds that the drastic change in the matrimonial life of a pregnant woman is equivalent to the change of her marital status

September 30, 2022 06:51 pm | Updated October 01, 2022 08:59 am IST - KOCHI

The Kerala High Court building in Ernakulam.

The Kerala High Court building in Ernakulam. | Photo Credit: H. Vibhu

Just when the Supreme Court has allowed unmarried women to have their 24-week pregnancy terminated, legal experts have hailed a recent Kerala High Court verdict allowing a married woman, who is living separately but is not legally divorced, to terminate her pregnancy without the permission of her husband.

While allowing the petition by a 21-year-old woman, Justice V.G. Arun held that she cannot be denied permission for terminating her pregnancy on the premise that she is not divorced and her marital status has, therefore, not changed. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act has included married women whose marital status has changed ((widowed or divorced) during the course of their pregnancy in the category of women eligible for termination of pregnancies up to 24 weeks.

‘No provision in Act’

The High Court held that “the drastic change in the matrimonial life of a pregnant woman is equivalent to the ‘change of her marital status.’ The word ‘divorce’ cannot in any manner qualify or restrict that right. The court also noted that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act does not contain any provision requiring a woman to obtain her husband’s permission for terminating the pregnancy. Supreme Court lawyer Kaleeswaram Raj said that the High Court order “upholds the woman’s autonomy and freedom. It reiterates a cardinal principle of constitutional morality that in a matrimony, wife is not the husband’s chattel”.

‘Ill treatment by husband’

In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court had permitted a woman to terminate her pregnancy from a consensual relationship. That was a radical pronouncement, as it travelled beyond the rigour of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules. The High Court order showed “the grandeur of humanism in interpretive jurisprudence,” he added. High Court lawyer Mohammed Shah said that the order was indeed a timely intervention to protect the rights of a pregnant woman, who was “ill-treated by her husband and in-laws”.

He added that the court recognises that the drastic change in the matrimonial life of a pregnant woman is tantamount to a change of her marital status as contemplated under Section 3B (c) of the MTP Act. In fact, the matrimonial life of the petitioner had completely changed due to the ill-treatment meted out by her husband and mother-in-law. The court has harmoniously read the wording in Section 3B(c) of the MTP Act with the scheme and intent of the Act, he added.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.