Kerala govt. may not grant clearance for prosecution in UAPA cases against CPI(M) activists

The two were accused of having circulated notices criticising the alleged encounter killing of four Maoists in the Manjakkatti forests in Palakkad district

November 03, 2019 01:51 pm | Updated 01:55 pm IST - THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Alan Suhaib (left) and Thaha Fazal are taken to a court in Kozhikode on November 1, 2019.

Alan Suhaib (left) and Thaha Fazal are taken to a court in Kozhikode on November 1, 2019.

The Kerala government is unlikely to accord clearance for prosecuting two Communist Party of India (Marxist) activists, Alan Shuhaib and Thaha Fazal, arrested under the provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) from Kozhikode on Saturday.

The two were accused of having circulated notices criticising the alleged encounter killing of four Maoists in the Manjakkatti forests in Palakkad district.

The arrest has drawn ire from various quarters, mainly from the CPI(M) leaders, including Left Democratic Front convener A.Vijayaraghavan, who reiterated on Sunday that the police were pursuing a course completely against the stated policy of the LDF government on the UAPA issue.

Official sources told The Hindu that the government would strictly go by a procedure laid for charging UAPA cases.

As per the procedure, such cases could be charged only with the clearance of the District Police Chief. An officer of the DYSP rank after investigation should seek permission for prosecution, secure legal opinion and take a final decision only with the concurrence of the government.

The government has constituted an UAPA Authority headed by a retired High Court Judge for granting permission for prosecution. Special Secretaries to Law and Home departments and Inspector-General (Internal Security) are members of the committee. Former High Court Judge P.S. Gopinathan is heading the committee at present.

The government would only go by the recommendations of the authority and, in the current context, may not give permission for prosecution. Earlier, permission for prosecution was denied in nine cases, eight of which were against Maoists, for want of evidence as per the recommendations of the authority, sources said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.