KAT post: Senkumar suffers a setback

CJI asks HC to resubmit the proposal to nominate him as KAT member

October 20, 2017 09:10 pm | Updated October 21, 2017 07:54 am IST - Thiruvananthapuram

T.P. Senkumar

T.P. Senkumar

Former State Police Chief T.P. Senkumar’s appointment as an administrative member of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal (KAT) seemed to have suffered a short-term setback on Friday.

The Chief Justice of India (CJI) has asked the Kerala High Court to resubmit the proposal to nominate Mr. Senkumar as a member of KAT after the disposal of cases/complaints stated to be pending against him in various fora.

K. Srinivas, Joint Secretary, Union Ministry of Personnel and Training, has communicated the CJI’s decision to the State government. The CJI has concurred with the High Court’s proposal to appoint V. Somasundaram, a retired bureaucrat, as an administrative member, KAT.

Mr. Senkumar was considered for the post in 2016 when there was no case pending against him. However, the government allegedly sat on the proposal for several months. Mr. Senkumar was constrained to move the High Court to get the State government to set the process in motion.

Consequent on his reinstatement as SPC by the apex court, Mr. Senkumar faced a slew of charges and complaints from various quarters, many of them at the fag end of his service.

For one, ADGP B. Sandhya complained to the government that Mr. Senkumar had risked the confidentiality of the investigation into the abduction and rape of a woman actor in Kochi in February. Subsequently, DGP Tomin Thachankery also accused Mr. Senkumar of verbally abusing him.

Certain private litigants moved the anti-corruption court here seeking to prosecute Mr. Senkumar for alleged corruption. (The court has found no merit in at least two such complaints.)

Consequently, the State government reported the cases and complaints pending against Mr. Senkumar to the Central government when the CJI was considering the High Court's proposal to nominate him to the KAT.

However, the CJI has not closed the door on Mr. Senkumar. Mr. Srinivas said in the communiqué that the CJI has "desired" the proposal to nominate Mr. Senkumar "may be resubmitted on receipt of the outcome of the cases/complaints stated to be pending before various fora."

Meanwhile, Mr. Senkumar moved the High Court seeking speedy disposal of the grievances against him.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.