Judicial officers to depose in LL.M copying case

Kerala High Court Administrative Committee grants them special leave

July 29, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 05:44 am IST

ix judicial officers have received the go ahead from the Kerala High Court Administrative Committee to depose before the Syndicate sub-committee of the Mahatma Gandhi University probing the copying case involving T. J. Jose, Inspector General of Police.

The judicial officers were among the 57 candidates who wrote the LL.M Constitutional Law examination along with Mr. Jose at St. Paul’s College, Kalamassery, on May 4.

They were seated close to Mr. Jose at the exam hall. Mr. Jose was allegedly caught cheating in the exam after the invigilators found him carrying incriminating materials. The Home Department had asked him to go on leave after the incident.

Panel chief’s plea

The Hindu has now reliably learnt that the administrative committee, headed by Chief Justice Ashok Bhushan and comprising High Court Judges Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, K.T. Sankaran, Antony Dominic, and T. R. Ramachandran Nair, gave its nod after the varsity panel chief made a plea to spare the judicial officers that include munsiffs, sub-judge, and a district judge.

Special leave has been sanctioned for the officers to depose before the panel at its sitting scheduled here on August 4.

Request for duty leave

The judicial officers had earlier requested the High Court authorities to provide duty leave to attend the sitting. But the request was placed before the administrative committee on the inference that the sub-committee was not a judicial body and one constituted by the university. Such powers lie with the administrative committee.

A final decision on de-barring Mr. Jose will be likely taken on the basis of the report to be submitted by a seven-member Syndicate panel headed by Prof. C. H. Abdul Latif.

“We will submit the final report by August 10. We had already collected the statements given by 13 other candidates,” he said.

The university rules prescribe de-barring the candidate found guilty of copying for a period ranging between one to six years. It will depend on the gravity of the offence.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.