Court rejects man’s talaq declaration

‘Reconciliation bid should be made before and after divorce’

May 17, 2017 08:31 pm | Updated May 18, 2017 07:55 am IST - MALAPPURAM

A court here has rejected a talaq declaration petition filed by a man and pronounced that the talaq he delivered in 2012 is illegal and against Islamic Shariat.

The judgment by Family Court Judge Ramesh Bhai here on Wednesday evoked much interest against the backdrop of the ongoing Supreme Court legal proceedings on triple talaq. The judge rejected the appeal filed by Ali Faizi, 45, seeking legalisation of the talaq declaration he made five years ago. Mr. Faizi claimed that he had divorced his wife, Jameela Pandarakandi, 36, by pronouncing talaq and sent a letter of talaq to the mahal committee on September 24, 2012.

His wife, Jameela, denied this claim, saying that Mr. Faizi had fabricated many stories, including the talaq story. They have a son in the marriage held in 1994. The court rejected the reasons put forth by Mr. Faizi for getting the talaq legalised, saying that they were not sound enough for a divorce stipulated by Islamic Shariat. The court also noted that no conciliation attempt had been made before pronouncing the talaq.

The court quoted a High Court verdict (Ummer Farook vs. Naseema 2005 (4) KLT 565) saying that for a talaq to be valid, it should be for a reasonable cause and be preceded by attempts of reconciliation between the husband and wife by two arbitrators. Quoting from another case, the court said that attempts of reconciliation should be made before and after the divorce.

The court observed that no such reconciliation was done in the case of Mr. Faizi and Ms. Jameela.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.