Cong terms KC(M) act betrayal

Party, however, not to end its ties with Mani’s party in local bodies

May 09, 2017 08:46 pm | Updated May 10, 2017 08:19 am IST - Thiruvananthapuram

Leader of the Opposition Ramesh Chennithala, Congress leader Oommen Chandy and Indian Union Muslim League Leader leader P.K. Kunhalikutty, MP, at a UDF meeting in Thiruvananthapuram on Tuesday.

Leader of the Opposition Ramesh Chennithala, Congress leader Oommen Chandy and Indian Union Muslim League Leader leader P.K. Kunhalikutty, MP, at a UDF meeting in Thiruvananthapuram on Tuesday.

The Congress political affairs committee (PAC) on Tuesday endorsed the Kottayam DCC’s resolution accusing Kerala Congress (M) [KC(M)] chairman K.M. Mani and his son Jose K. Mani of political opportunism in wresting the Kottayam district panchayat president’s post with the help of the CPI(M).

The PAC unanimously came out strongly against Mr. Mani and his son, terming their act as a betrayal. However, the party decided not to end its ties with the KC(M) in the local bodies as a tactical line. Later, KPCC president M.M. Hassan told reporters that the KC(M)’s stand was an act of betrayal. It was Mr. Jose K. Mani who gave the leadership, with the tacit approval of Mr. Mani. A large section of the KC(M) workers had opposed the it.

Mr. Hassan said the ties in the local bodies with the KC(M) was on a different level. The party had, therefore, decided to continue them, even while accepting the departure of the KC(M) from the UDF. Mr. Mani and his son were solely responsible for this.

‘Opportunistic politics’

Mr. Hassan turned the gun on the CPI(M) for following opportunistic politics. The party had made bar bribery case a strong campaign point in the last Assembly election. The CPI(M) had now come up with an extraordinary explanation that it had supported a Mr. Mani to fight against corruption, he said.

The KPCC, however, termed P.J. Kurien’s remarks against Mr. Mani as his personal opinion.

Despite all the high voltage activity of the past two days, the PAC appeared to have observed restraint while criticising the KC(M). The decision not to upset local alliances has left the door a shade open for rapprochement, but given the low levels of trust between the two parties, it remains to be seen whether the arrangement will hold.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.