CS ignored ACS’s counselin Tom Jose case, court told

January 27, 2017 09:00 pm | Updated 09:00 pm IST - Thiruvananthapuram:

A Special Court here on Friday heard that Additional Chief Secretary (ACS), Home, Nalini Netto had written at least 10 letters to the State government seeking penal action against ACS, Labour and Industries, Tom Jose, after the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) arraigned him as accused in an illegal amassment of wealth case.

Legal Advisor, VACB, C. C. Augustine told the court that he would submit the communication when the court considers the case again on February 6. Ms. Netto had forwarded the letters she received from VACB Director Jacob Thomas to Chief Secretary (CS) S.M. Vijayanand.

Inquiry Commissioner and Special Judge A. Baharudeen was considering a private plea that Mr. Vijayanand be prosecuted “for holding back” scores of recommendations from Ministers and department heads seeking anti-corruption enquiries or departmental action against bureaucrats suspected of graft.

The judge asked the VACB whether the Chief Secretary had authority to withhold action against bureaucrats facing anti-corruption probes.

Certain legal quarters interpreted his remark as an adverse comment on Mr. Vijayanand’s function. Some others maintained that the Chief Secretary, who had discretionary powers in service matters of bureaucrats, had acted well within his legal bounds and judge had merely sought information on the powers of the Chief Secretary.

The complainant Paichira Nawaz had alleged that the Chief Secretary ignored Ms. Netto’s counsel and perfunctorily dismissed VACB’s letters seeking suspension of Mr. Jose from service without assigning any justifiable reason. He said the Chief Secretary had also ignored files seeking prosecution of former State Police Chief T.P. Senkumar on the charges of maladministration and misconduct.

Last week, the court had ordered Ms. Netto to produce all files concerning the service matters of Mr. Jose and Mr. Sen. Mr. Augustine submitted three files. The judge said they were voluminous and he required time till February 6 to study them.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.