ADVERTISEMENT

Submit offer made to Infosys on lake revival, Karnataka HC tells government

December 02, 2020 03:19 am | Updated 10:03 am IST - Bengaluru

High Court of Karnataka says the process of involving corporate entities in lake maintenance must be fair and transparent

Karnataka : Bengaluru : 25/11/2016 : Fire personnel looking for the body of Irfan who was drowned in Hebbal lake till late eveing in Bengaluru on Friday 25 November 2016. Photo : Sudhakara Jain.

The High Court of Karnataka on Tuesday directed the State government to produce the offer made to the Infosys Foundation to rejuvenate and maintain Hebbal lake in Mysuru while observing that perhaps the government would have got better offers if it had issued public notice inviting corporate entities to come forward to assist in taking care of State’s lakes.

Even if the law permits allowing corporate entities to maintain lakes, the process of allowing their participation must be fair and transparent, the court said, while directing the government to produce the process followed before entering into Memorandum of Understanding (MoU).

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice S. Vishwajith Shetty issued the directions during the hearing of a batch of PIL petitions related to lakes and stormwater drains.

ADVERTISEMENT

The court, in March, had restrained the government from signing more MoUs while observing that

prima facie , by way of the MoUs, the government wants to shift its obligation to corporate entities. The government had told the HC that it had signed an MoU with Infosys Foundation for Hebbal lake in Mysuru in 2016; and five more MoUs were signed between 2017 and 2020 with Bharat Electronics Ltd., Biocon Foundation, Titan Company Ltd., Say Trees Environmental Trust and CMR University for rejuvenating and maintaining Doddabommasandra, Hebbagodi, Veerasandra, Nallurahalli and Chagalatti lakes in the city, respectively.

Asking whether any public notices were issued inviting proposal for lake maintenance from corporate entities, the Bench asked whether the works entrusted in the MoU are permissible as per the report, submitted by a committee headed by Justice N.K. Patil, a then judge of the High Court, which was approved by the High Court in 2012.

Observing that it is the duty of the State government to stop those works not permitted as per the 2012 order of the High Court based in Justice Patil Committee Report, the Bench directed the government to submit the details of extent of works carried out and whether the corporate entities have complied with the terms of the MoU.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Bench also asked the State government and the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike to make their stand clear on whether corporate entities are in possession of the lakes besides clarifying whether any officers has been nominated to ensure that they adhere to terms.

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT