SC invalidates domicile rule for PG medical quota seats

State has to re-publish calendar of events

April 05, 2018 12:51 am | Updated 12:51 am IST - NEW DELHI

The Supreme Court on Wednesday declared invalid a Karnataka government condition restricting postgraduate admissions for medical and dental government quota seats to students with minimum 10 years domicile in the State.

‘Modify info bulletin’

In an 18-page judgment by a Bench of Justices Arun Mishra and U.U. Lalit, the SC directed Karnataka to amend and modify the information bulletin jointly issued by the State Directorate of Medical Education and Karnataka Examinations Authority on March 10.

The court ordered the State to re-publish the calendar of events in terms of the judgment and complete the entire process within the timeline stipulated by the regulatory authorities.

Plea by 44 doctors

The judgment was based on a petition filed by 44 doctors, who did their MBBS/BDS courses from Karnataka and have cleared the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test for Post Graduation (NEET-PG) 2018 examination with high merit and are aspiring for admission to PG courses in the State.

The court said that the domicile condition of 10 years bars even students who completed their MBBS and BDS courses from colleges in Karnataka to compete for government quota seats. “We hold Clause 4.1 of the Information Bulletin (PGET-2018) to be invalid to the extent it disqualifies petitioners and similarly situated candidates who completed their MBBS/BDS degree courses from colleges situated in Karnataka from competing for admission to postgraduate medical/dental courses in government medical colleges and against government quota seats in non-governmental institutions,” Justice Lalit, who wrote the verdict, held.

State’s argument

Karnataka government argued that the as per the eligibility conditions, only candidates of Karnataka origin could compete for admission to 50% government seats in government colleges and against government quota seats in private colleges. It submitted that these conditions were “stipulated inorder to ensure that the State’s requirement of skilled human resource is met with”. The State reasoned that the Post-Graduate Medical Education Regulation, 2000, of the Medical Council of India (MCI) does not prohibit the State from stipulating eligibility conditions for PG courses.

The MCI, however, referred to past judgments of the Supreme Court to argue that the “preference based on domicile was violative of the principle of equality”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.