Not enough evidence against me, Shivakumar tells Delhi HC

He says money-laundering case is a result of political rivalry

October 15, 2019 10:46 pm | Updated October 16, 2019 07:33 am IST - New Delhi

New Delhi:  Karnataka Congress leader D K Shivakumar  leaves after being produced at Rouse Avenue Court in New Delhi, Wednesday, Sept 4, 2019. Shivakumar, arrested in a money laundering case, was sent to the ED custody till September 13 by the court today. (PTI Photo/Ravi Choudhary)(PTI9_4_2019_000197B)

New Delhi: Karnataka Congress leader D K Shivakumar leaves after being produced at Rouse Avenue Court in New Delhi, Wednesday, Sept 4, 2019. Shivakumar, arrested in a money laundering case, was sent to the ED custody till September 13 by the court today. (PTI Photo/Ravi Choudhary)(PTI9_4_2019_000197B)

Congress leader D.K. Shivakumar, whose judicial custody in connection with a money-laundering case has been extended till October 25, told the High Court of Delhi that the case was a result of political rivalry and there was not enough evidence against him.

The court was hearing his bail plea. Mr. Shivakumar’s counsel also sought relief on medical grounds, saying his client underwent angiography procedure in September and has been in custody for 45 days. He said his client should not be kept in jail for so many days.

Justice Suresh Kait heard the arguments of the Congress leader’s counsel and listed the matter for the submissions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on October 17.

The case was based on a chargesheet (prosecution complaint) filed by the Income Tax Department last year before a special court in Bengaluru on charges of alleged tax evasion and ‘hawala’ transactions worth crores.

Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, representing Mr. Shivakumar, said the money-laundering case was a result of political rivalry.

He said it was a case only under the Income Tax Act but the ED added the provision of criminal conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code just to make it a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and to justify the arrest.

Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, also appearing for Mr. Shivakumar, argued that there was no evidence against him except under provisions of the I-T Act, which are compoundable.

Mr. Shivakumar, arrested in a case under the PMLA by the ED, has approached the high court challenging the trial court’s order denying him bail.

Denying him bail, the trial court had said he was an influential person and if he is released at a crucial stage of investigation, he might influence witnesses or tamper with documents.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.