GESCOM plea for tariff revision opposed

February 09, 2017 12:36 am | Updated February 03, 2018 01:34 pm IST - KALABURAGI:

The Hyderabad Karnataka Environment Awareness and Protection Organisation (HKEAPO) has opposed the plea made before Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) by Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company (GESCOM) for revision of power tariff for both commercial and domestic consumers and charged GESCOM with transferring the burden of loss of power, high cost of power and other financial irregularities onto consumers.

HKEAPO president Deepak Gala in a petition filed before KERC has opposed the demand made by GESCOM for revision of power tariff. He said that GESCOM’s energy loss continued to be high at 18.10 % as against the approved distribution loss of 16.5 % by KERC.

GESCOM could have saved at least ₹ 52.85 crore by way of keeping energy loss at 16.5 %. Mr. Gala charged GESCOM with wantonly showing energy loss on the lower side.

He said that an estimated 55 per cent of the total energy sale by GESCOM was unmetered.

He said that as per the admission made by GESCOM in its application, 675 of the total 1,595 feeders had recorded transmission and distribution loss ranging from 20 % to 39 %, indicating a very high energy loss in 42 % of feeders.

Accusing GESCOM of purchasing power at a very high cost, Mr. Gala said that GESCOM has admitted that it had purchased 0.95 million units of power from Jurala Hydro Electric Scheme at a rate of ₹ 51 per unit and paid ₹ 4.95 crore.

GESCOM had also violated conditions laid down by KERC on short-term power purchase and exceeded the stipulated cost of ₹ 4.50 per unit. GESCOM had purchased 467.42 MU of power on short-term basis by paying ₹ 235.81 crore where as the actual cost should have been ₹ 210.39 crore if the cost per unit had been limited to ₹ 4.50.

Mr. Gala said that KERC had earlier rejected GESCOM’s application for recovery through tariff the payment of ₹ 262.49 crore to Pension Trust (P&G Trust). KERC had said that this amount should be paid by the State government and that it cannot be passed onto consumers. Despite this rejection, GESCOM had included this amount in the application now for fresh revision of tariff.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.