High Court fiat to ECI on electoral roll revision

November 04, 2019 10:45 pm | Updated 10:45 pm IST - Bengaluru

BANGALORE, 11/12/2007: A view of Karnataka High Court in Bangalore.
Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy 11-12-2007

BANGALORE, 11/12/2007: A view of Karnataka High Court in Bangalore. Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy 11-12-2007

Posing a series of questions to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on the procedure followed for revision of electoral rolls, the High Court of Karnataka on Monday directed the ECI to clarify whether there was any guideline laid down for deletion of electors under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960.

The court also directed the ECI to specify whether acknowledgement, for the claims for inclusion of names or corrections to be carried out in the electoral rolls or objections for any entry, are issued to citizens on receipt of applications in the prescribed forms.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar issued the directions during hearing a PIL petition filed by Whitefield Rising Trust, a Bengaluru based NGO, on various lacunae in preparation and revision of electoral rolls.

Of public importance

Terming the issue as that of public importance, the Bench directed the ECI to clarify whether there was any procedure followed to communicate the lacuna or objections to the applicants, and in what manner the copies of orders on rejection of claims or objections or inquiries on claims or objections are furnished to the persons who submit claims or objections.

Outer limit

The ECI has also been directed to specify whether it has fixed any outer limit for deciding the claims or objections for inclusion or corrections in the electoral rolls or objections in the entries in the rolls. Besides, the Bench also wanted an answer from the ECI on how rejection of applications for inclusion of names or carrying out corrections are communicated to the applicants.

Giving a month’s time to the ECI to submit answers to these queries, the Bench adjourned further hearing till December 10.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.