Four police officers guilty of favouritism towards candidates: Report

They have been transferred to non-executive posts with immediate effect

April 17, 2019 11:16 pm | Updated 11:16 pm IST - Bengaluru

Favouritism by police officers towards electoral candidates has caused a major embarrassment to the Police Department. An inquiry report submitted to the Karnataka Chief Election Commission (CEC) on April 15 found four officers, including an Assistant Commissioner of Police and three inspectors, guilty of favouring candidates fielded by “ruling parties” and discarding complaints filed against them ahead of the Lok Sabha elections.

The issue of favouritism was brought up by members of the BJP, who filed several complaints with the CEC, which then sought a report from the DG-IGP’s office, and necessary action to be taken against Ravi Prasad, ACP (Yeshwantpur sub-division); P.T. Srinivas, Inspector (Peenya); Shiva Reddy, Inspector (Jnanabharathi); and Mudduraj, Inspector (Yeshwantpur).

However, when no action was initiated, the CEC set up a joint inquiry team comprising Shivayogi Kalasad, IAS, Regional Commissioner, and D. Roopa, Inspector General of Police (Railways), directing them to submit a report. The inquiry team concluded that there were serious lapses on part of the officials, and recommended that they be replaced to ensure fair polls.

The CEC sent the report to the DG&IGP, who transferred the police officials to non-executive posts with immediate effect. One of the statements was from Public Prosecutor Revanna Siddappa who said that Ravi Prasad and Srinivas did not arrest an accused booked in a criminal case as he belonged to a political party. The officials did this to help him campaign, Mr. Siddappa said. The report was substantiated by photographs of the accused actively participating in election campaigns.

Mr. Siddappa also said that the officers failed to file objections for anticipatory bail applied by the accused. Two officers also booked cases against BJP workers in Jalahalli police station while a counter complaint filed had been burked.

The committee noted that they registered cases and entertained complaints on behalf of one political party but failed to consider others. Mudduraj had filed three cases against BJP workers without considering their counter complaints. “...The said officers often accompanied the candidate of a particular party during campaigning on the pretext of law and order maintenance, which in turn, influences the voters because of their presence in uniform,” read the report.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.