Denotification case: Complainant demands resignations of Yediyurappa, Nirani

‘They will prove to be an impediment for a fair probe’

January 16, 2021 01:47 am | Updated 01:47 am IST - Bengaluru

A. Alam Pasha, complainant in a case alleging corruption against Chief Minister B.S. Yediyurappa and Minister Murugesh Nirani into which the High Court of Karnataka recently allowed a probe, demanded that both the leaders should immediately resign so that “they do not frustrate the investigation and criminal proceedings against them”.

“They occupying powerful positions in the government will prove to be an impediment for a fair probe,” he said, addressing a press conference on Friday.

Significantly, this comes within days of Mr. Nirani being sworn in as a Minister and before Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s scheduled inauguration of his sugar factory in Bagalkot district on January 17.

Mr. Pasha alleged forgery and corruption in the process of withdrawal of 26 acres of industrial land allotted to him near Devanahalli when Mr. Nirani was Industries Minister in the previous BJP government. The Lokayukta police had filed a chargesheet in the case against the two leaders and other officers. However, the High Court had quashed criminal proceedings against them in 2013 on the grounds that there was no prior permission for prosecution. Mr. Pasha later filed a private complaint in the case in 2015, which was challenged by Mr. Yediyurappa. Mr. Yediyurappa’s petition was recently dismissed by the High Court saying there was no bar on the complainant to file a fresh complaint.

Nirani hits back

However, Mr. Nirani hit back at Mr. Pasha, and defended the government’s action of withdrawing the allotment of 26 acres of industrial land to him in 2011. “The allottee failed to pay ₹9.36 crore towards 20% of the cost of land allotted, despite several requests by the KIADB. The financial audit of the company revealed that the firm had no capacity to carry out the project and hence the allotment was cancelled,” Mr. Nirani said, adding there was no foul play in the case and they would fight the same legally.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.