Kancha Ilaiah case: We’re not here to ban books, says Supreme Court

Supreme Court dismisses petition to ban a book written by the Dalit writer.

Updated - December 04, 2021 10:43 pm IST

Published - October 14, 2017 07:16 pm IST - NEW DELHI

Professor Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd. File

Professor Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd. File

It is not up to the Supreme Court to use its powers to ban books, which are a free expression of a writer’s thoughts and feelings about the society and world he lives in. Courts cannot be asked to gag free expression. The Supreme Court has always placed the fundamental right to free speech at the highest pedestal.

This is what the Supreme Court recorded in its two-page order while dismissing a petition to ban a book written by writer and activist Professor Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd called Samajika Smugglurlu Komatollu .

The petition filed by advocate K.L.N.V. Veeranjaneyulu also took exception to a particular chapter in a book titled ‘Post-Hindu India’ called ‘Hindutv-Mukt Bharat’. The book is critical about the caste system prevailing in India, especially in the Arya Vysya community.


“Any request for banning a book of the present nature has to be strictly scrutinized because every author or writer has a fundamental right to speak out ideas freely and express thoughts adequately. Curtailment of an individual writer/author's right to freedom of speech and expression should never be lightly viewed,” a Bench of Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud recorded in the order. The court dismissed the petition to uphold the fundamental right of free speech, “keeping in view the sanctity of the said right and also bearing in mind that the same has been put on the highest pedestal by this court”.

The court snubbed the petitioner, observing that his prayer to ban the book of Prof. Shepherd is rather an “ambitious” one. “When an author writes a book, it is his or her right of expression. We do not think that it would be appropriate under Article 32 of the Constitution of India that this court should ban the book/books,” the Supreme Court held.

Prof. Shepherd had recently challenged his detractors in the Arya Vysya community, saying he was prepared to withdraw his book of the representatives of the community were prepared to earmark 5% jobs in their establishments to Dalits, Adivasis and members from the washermen and barber communities.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.