J&K High Court takes exception to The Hindu report, terms it ‘untrue’ 

The news item has been withdrawn. The publication was not intended to cast aspersions on the functioning of the Court or mislead the public

Updated - September 05, 2024 01:22 am IST - SRINAGAR

The J&K High Court on Wednesday (September 4, 2024) took notice of the report published by The Hindu titled “NIA cases listed before J&K HC Bench led by Atul Sreedharan shifted” and described it as “false, malicious and contemptuous as same amounts to interference in the administration of justice”.

“The Court is also disturbed by the incorrect factual aspect given in the social media post and also in the newspaper that one of us (Atul Sreedharan-J) had gone on leave on account of the change in roster which is patently untrue as the said Judge had taken a casual leave on 02.09.2024 on account of medical reasons,” the Division Bench, comprising Justice Atul Sreedharan and Justice Mohammad Yousuf Wani, observed in the order. 

The Bench said this “misrepresentation not only misleads the public but also damages trust in the Judiciary... gives an impression that the said Judge went on a protest leave against a change in roster. This also gives an impression that the said Judge is interested in getting certain cases of a particular type listed before him and decided”.

The Court said that the Registrar General’s note further said that the Honourable Chief Justice has from time to time constituted special Benches for prioritising olds cases, detention and liberty matters. “The roster was also modified as per previous practice, whereby inter alia the subject matters relating to NIA cases for Admission, Orders and Hearing and all Habeas Corpus petitions for Admission, Orders and Hearing were retained by Hon`ble Chief Justice (Acting)...,” it added.

The Court said that at no point of time, NIA petitions were heard by any Special Bench and “for the first time in order to expedite these matters, the NIA matters were considered as separate as same being a matter of liberty and concern for the security of the Country and in view of the sensitivity involved in these matters”.

The Court has asked the Registrar Judicial “to place this matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice (Acting) to consider whether this matter should be placed before an appropriate Bench for initiation of criminal contempt against the publishers”.

The matter will come up before a Division Bench on Thursday. 

NOTE: The news item has been withdrawn. The publication was not intended to cast aspersions on the functioning of the Court or mislead the public. We apologise for any wrong impression that may have been conveyed by it. -- Editor
0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.