Chidambaram's family charged under Black Money Act

Nalini Chidambaram, Karti and Dr. Srinidhi have been charged for allegedly not disclosing immovable assets in the U.K. and the U.S.

May 11, 2018 05:03 pm | Updated December 01, 2021 12:36 pm IST - Chennai

 Karti Chidambaram (centre), son of former Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, flanked by his mother Nalini Chidambaram and wife Srinidhi in New Delhi. File

Karti Chidambaram (centre), son of former Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, flanked by his mother Nalini Chidambaram and wife Srinidhi in New Delhi. File

The Income Tax Department on Friday filed four charge sheets against former Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram's wife Nalini, son Karti Chidambaram and daughter-in-law Dr. Srinidhi under the Black Money Act for allegedly not disclosing their foreign assets. The charge sheets or prosecution complaints were filed by the department before a special court in Chennai under Section 50 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, officials said.

Ms. Nalini, Mr. Karti and Dr. Srinidhi have been charged for allegedly not disclosing, either partly or fully, immovable assets like the one at Cambridge in the United Kindgom worth ₹5.37 crore, property worth ₹80 lakh in the same country and assets worth ₹ 3.28 crore in the U.S., they said.

The charge sheets claimed that the Chidambarams “did not disclose” these investments to the tax authority as also by the firm co-owned by Mr. Karti — Chess Global Advisory, in violation of the black money law.

Govt.’s drive against black money

The law was brought in by the Modi government in 2015 as part of its drive against black money and to prosecute those Indians who have secretly stashed away illicit wealth abroad.

The department recently issued notices to Mr. Karti and his family members in the case which he had challenged before the Madras High Court.

Mr. Karti had refused to join the probe, stating that he had submitted the details of the asset and related transactions undertaken last year to another tax authority, and that “parallel proceedings” cannot take place against an individual under the same law.

The writ petition was later quashed by the High Court.

Officials said the charge sheet had been filed as the investigation of the case had reached its “logical conclusion” and thus it could be presented before the court.

The department slapped the Black Money Act against Mr. Karti last year after it found that assets created by him abroad were in alleged violation of law.

The anti-black money law deals with cases of overseas illegal assets, which till recently were probed under the Income Tax Act, 1961. It has provisions for a steep 120 per cent tax and penalty on undisclosed foreign assets and income, besides carrying a jail term of up to 10 years.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.