In a fix over House reply, Centre does U-turn in court

“69 suggestions of Ashok Chawla panel not accepted”

August 23, 2012 11:38 pm | Updated July 13, 2016 01:16 pm IST - New Delhi:

B.Line:Finance Secretary, Ashok Chawla  addrerssiong the media persons on Post Budget in the capital on 06.07.2009. Pic: Kamal Narang.

B.Line:Finance Secretary, Ashok Chawla addrerssiong the media persons on Post Budget in the capital on 06.07.2009. Pic: Kamal Narang.

In a reply which is likely to cause a major embarrassment to it in Parliament, the Centre on Thursday informed the Supreme Court that it had not accepted 69 of the 81 recommendations of the Ashok Chawla Committee that natural resources be auctioned.

On August 9, three questions were raised in the Rajya Sabha — “whether it is a fact that the Ashok Chawla Committee has submitted its report in the wake of the 2G spectrum scam to the government; if so, the details of the recommendations and the number of recommendations that have been accepted; and how many are yet to be accepted and what is the time frame.”

Minister of State for Finance Namo Narain Meena, in a written reply, said the committee gave 81 recommendations covering eight natural resources — coal, minerals, petroleum, natural gas, spectrum, forests, land and water. He said: “The government has accepted 69 recommendations, one has not been accepted and 11 are under consideration.”

Answer to be corrected

Completely disowning this reply, the Telecom Secretary, in a note approved by the Cabinet Secretariat and filed in the court on Thursday, said “the statement and the answer that the government has accepted 69 recommendations are not accurate and the correct position is that it was decided that the 69 recommendations would be pursued by the individual Ministries in a timely manner. The Department of Economic Affairs [Ministry of Finance] is taking steps to correct the answer in the Rajya Sabha.”

Swamy’s argument

Last week, during arguments on the ‘2G Presidential Reference’, Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy produced documents in the court to show that the government had accepted the Chawla Committee’s recommendations.

He said “the government has adopted auction as a policy for certain natural resources. They have asked the Ministries to implement it. A Reference is not necessary and any opinion by the court may create a piquant situation.”

Opinion reserved

Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia then asked Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati to respond to Dr. Swamy’s submissions.

The court, thereafter, reserved its opinion on the issue.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.