IMA slams govt.’s move to replace MCI

Says the action is ‘unwarranted and malafide’

September 29, 2018 10:27 pm | Updated 10:28 pm IST - NEW DELHI

A doctor in Karnataka wears a black badge in protest against the NMC Bill.

A doctor in Karnataka wears a black badge in protest against the NMC Bill.

The Indian Medical Association (IMA) action committee, in an emergency session in Mumbai, condemned the “supersession” of the Medical Council of India (MCI) and noted that “this action of the Government, at a juncture when the election to the MCI has been announced, is unwarranted and malafide.”

Earlier this week, in a move to enhance the governance and the quality of medical education, an Ordinance was issued dissolving the MCI and replacing it with a seven-member Board of Governors (BOG) led by NITI Aayog member Dr. V.K. Paul.

A Bill to replace the MCI with the National Medical Commission (NMC) is pending in Parliament.

The Board of Governors also includes Dr. Randeep Guleria, Director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi; Dr. Jagat Ram, Director, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh; Dr. B. N. Gangadhar, Director, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru; and Dr. Nikhil Tandon, Professor, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism at AIIMS Delhi.

‘It is unacceptable’

A release issued by the IMA on Saturday, said the composition of the Board itself was unacceptable. “Directors of major institutions would scarcely find time to administer more than 450 medical colleges and their undergraduate and postgraduate courses. Moreover, there is no representation to women and registered medical practitioners,” said the release.

The IMA added that the “supersession” of the MCI is only a smokescreen and a ploy to prepare the ground for the NMC and sabotage the democratic process of the Council. That the government was in a hurry to scuttle the democratic election process was evident, it said. The Association demanded that the Board should refrain from taking major policy decisions or amendments changing the character of the IMC Act. It also demanded that the election process of the MCI should be allowed to continue. “This is the fourth time that the BOGs are being appointed. All the previous attempts were abject failures. The eminent clinicians appointed have little exposure to the day-to-day administration of the MCI. Moreover, the government has not cited any reason for superseding the MCI,’’ said IMA national president Dr. Ravi Wankhedkar.

The Association has demanded that the BOG should conform to the basic tenets of the IMC Act and refrain from tinkering with its fundamental structure. “Crosspathy, registration of non medical persons, bridge courses and mixing of syllabi are core concerns. 184 private medical colleges are awaiting recognition due to the strict norms of the outgoing MCI team. By removing the democratically elected MCI checks and balances have been removed and chances of arbitrary actions have increased. A generation of substandard doctors will be the legacy of this action,’’ noted the release.

Top News Today


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.