Govt rolls back changes to UPSC mains exam

March 21, 2013 03:00 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 07:48 am IST - New Delhi

Student members of the ABVP and JNU protest outside the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) office in New Delhi against making an English paper compulsory on March11, 2013 Photo: S. Subramanium

Student members of the ABVP and JNU protest outside the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) office in New Delhi against making an English paper compulsory on March11, 2013 Photo: S. Subramanium

The English essay paper of 100 marks in the 2013 Civil Services Main Examination, which raised a nation-wide controversy, has been dropped and the earlier practice of two qualifying papers in any Indian language and English restored, government said on Thursday.

“The English component (of 100 marks) from the Essay Paper will be dropped and the status quo ante of two qualifying papers of 300 marks each in any modern Indian language and in English -- shall be restored,” Minister of State for Personnel V Narayanasamy said in the Lok Sabha.

In a statement on the issue, he said the essay paper would now be of 250 marks to be written in the medium or language of the candidate’s choice.

Bowing to all-round pressure in Parliament, government on March 15 had kept in abeyance the recent controversial notification of the UPSC, giving more weightage to English in these exams.

As before, the candidates would be allowed to use any one language from the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution or English as the medium of writing the examination, he said.

The controversial conditionality imposed by the Union Public Service Commission that language would be allowed as the medium of examination only if a minimum of 25 candidates wanted it has been dropped, Mr Narayanasamy said.

Further, he said that a candidate would be allowed to take up literature as an optional subject “without the conditionality of having to do his/her graduation in that language’s literature.”

The Minister said these decisions were taken after the government took into account the views expressed by MPs in Parliament, representations on the notification and consultation with different agencies.

Government had kept the UPSC notification in abeyance after the two Houses of Parliament witnessed repeated uproar and adjournments, with members terming the notification as “unconstitutional” and demanding its rollback. They had also sought action against the UPSC chief and others responsible for the action, which they said went against regional languages.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.