Got convictions in all Godhra cases: SIT

Refutes allegation by Zakia Jafri of a larger conspiracy behind the riots

December 01, 2021 10:31 pm | Updated 10:31 pm IST - NEW DELHI

The Special Investigation Team (SIT) which probed the post-Godhra riots of 2002 said on Wednesday that everyone of the cases it investigated led to convictions.

Appearing before a Bench led by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi said trial court had used the evidence collected by the SIT to reach its conclusions on the guilt of the accused persons.

Previously, the SIT had maintained that it had done an impeccable job of the investigation. Mr. Rohatgi said the SIT had often walked the extra mile to meet the ends of justice.

The SIT was countering allegations made by Zakia Jafri, the widow of Congress leader Ehsan Jafri who was killed by a mob, of “collaboration” with conspirators. Ms. Jafri alleged a larger conspiracy behind the riots.

Mr. Rohatgi said the SIT had examined the then Chief Minister, members of the Cabinet at that time, top police officers and bureaucrats. He said the allegations of a “larger conspiracy” behind the riots was baseless. The role of every accused was looked into by the SIT.

Accusations of “collaboration” by SIT were reckless, he had submitted.

The SIT had filed a closure report in February 2012. It had given a clean chit to Mr. Modi, the current Prime Minister, and 63 others, including senior government officials, saying there was “no prosecutable evidence” against them.

A ‘protest petition’ filed by Ms. Jafri against the clean chit was dismissed by the Magistrate. The Gujarat High Court too, in October 2017, refused to entertain Ms. Jafri, who had then moved the apex court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.