Triple ‘talaq’ Bill introduced in Lok Sabha amid Opposition protest

The treasury wins with 186 “ayes” to the 74 Opposition “no” votes.

Updated - December 04, 2021 11:53 pm IST

Published - June 21, 2019 02:22 pm IST - New Delhi

Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad speaks in the Lok Sabha on June 21, 2019. Photo: LSTV

Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad speaks in the Lok Sabha on June 21, 2019. Photo: LSTV

The government on Friday introduced The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019, also known as the triple ‘talaq’ Bill in the Lok Sabha, the first legislation of the Modi government in its second term, amid protests by Opposition members, who claimed it was violative of the Constitution. 

The Bill was introduced after the Opposition asked for a division of votes, with the treasury winning with 186 “ayes” to the 74 Opposition “no” votes. 

Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, who introduced the Bill, asserted that the legislation was about gender justice and equality. The bill was not about religion but a “question of dignity of women and we are committed to safeguard it”. There were 543 cases of triple ‘talaq’ reported in the country. Even after the Supreme Court judgement banning the practice, more than 200 cases were reported, necessitating, in his view, a Bill that addressed the issue. “The job of Parliament is to legislate and it is up to courts to interpret the law,” he said.


Several Opposition members stood up to protest as soon as Mr. Prasad was asked by Speaker Om Birla to table the Bill. The Speaker asked Congress member Shashi Tharoor, Revolutionary Socialist Party’s N.K. Premachandran and All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen’s (AIMIM) Asaduddin Owaisi to present their views. 

Mr. Tharoor said he was against the practice of triple ‘talaq’, already voided by the Supreme Court order, but opposed the Bill as it conflated civil and criminal law. The Bill was a “textbook example of class legislation” as it was pointed at one community — Muslims — even though abandoning wives was not unique to it. 

Mr. Owaisi said the BJP’s “affection” for Muslim women and this advocacy of gender justice was suspect, considering the party’s opposition to the entry of Hindu women into the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. The Bill violated constitutional rights as it stipulated a three-year jail term for Muslim men, whereas a similar offence by non-Muslim men attracted only a year of jail term. 

Mr. Premachandran made similar points opposing the Bill. 

The Bill had faced objections from Opposition parties from the beginning. They had claimed that jail term for a man for divorcing his wife was legally untenable.

The new Bill is a copy of the ordinance in force. Bills that are introduced in the Rajya Sabha and are pending there do not lapse with the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.

However, bills passed by the Lok Sabha and pending in the Rajya Sabha lapse with the dissolution of the Lower House. The government had promulgated the ordinance on triple ‘talaq’ twice — in September 2018 and in February 2019 — as the contentious Bill remained pending in the Rajya Sabha, though it was passed by the Lok Sabha.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.