Elite cultures have dominated discourse: Romila Thapar

Dr. Thapar suggested that the past history of India might not be as rosy as it had been made out to be.

Updated - December 21, 2014 03:23 am IST - CHENNAI:

Professor R. Champakalakshmi, historian Romila Thapar and Chairman of Kalakshetra Foundation N. Gopalaswami at Kalakshetra in Chennai onSaturday. Photo: M. Karunakaran

Professor R. Champakalakshmi, historian Romila Thapar and Chairman of Kalakshetra Foundation N. Gopalaswami at Kalakshetra in Chennai onSaturday. Photo: M. Karunakaran

“We have to seek out and discuss insights that will give meaning to construction of our heritage. To give priority to certain patterns of culture — elite or religion, or language, or regional cultures — leaves the search incomplete,” renowned historian Romila Thapar said on Saturday.

“We have to accommodate many more aspects of our diverse cultures, if we are to justify the richness of India’s diversity. It requires sensitivity to track the constant adjustments made by the cultural forms and to a changing history,” she said, delivering the Rukmini Devi Memorial Lecture at Kalakshetra on Saturday.

Ms. Thapar urged the gathering to explore what constituted the idea of ‘heritage’, ‘tradition’ and ‘culture’. “It would reveal how the elite cultures have dominated the discourse and how it has had many influences,” she said.

In an hour-long lecture, Dr. Thapar suggested that the past history of India might not be as rosy as it had been made out to be. “Tradition is the result of the interplay between what existed in the past and our present aspirations. Often religious rituals, on investigation, been found to have been invented much later. The past has been invented to legitimise our actions in the present,” she said.

Even as she said that elite cultures had dominated the cultural discourse over generations, she affirmed that elite cultures must still be relevant. “It can provide information as to how it deals with other groups.”

She even suggested that different cultures in India might have had different experiences with respect to the four-fold varna system. “The hierarchy has differed. The dominant caste has not always been the same. In some societies, varna stratification is absent altogether,” she said.

Speaking of India’s experience with colonisers, Dr. Thapar said there were flip sides too. The Turkish, Persian, and Afghan influences in the north-western parts of India had been dismissed as belonging to invaders. But they brought in trade, a new style of sculpture, and also a language tied to their religious beliefs. British rulers wanted to reorganise the economy and drain the wealth but they were curious about the Indian past, constructing our heritage and leaving behind texts that revealed their preferences, she said.

Dr. Thapar pointed out how the definition of national culture was contested. “Many cultures are competing for inclusion. Especially in societies that boast multiple cultures. Sometimes, contestation leads to destruction of heritage, possibly for political reasons like the Babri Masjid.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.