Elgar Parishad case | Activist Arun Ferreira moves High Court for default bail

The activist, in his petition, said his case stands on par with Sudha Bharadwaj, who was granted default bail by the Bombay High Court.

August 19, 2022 09:12 pm | Updated 09:12 pm IST - Mumbai

Human rights activist Arun Ferreira. File

Human rights activist Arun Ferreira. File | Photo Credit: PTI

Activist Arun Ferreira, one of the accused in the Elgar Parishad-maoist link case, has approached the Bombay High Court seeking a default bail on parity with co-accused Sudha Bharadwaj, who was granted relief in December 2021.

Mr. Ferreira's petition came up for hearing on Friday before a division bench of Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Sharmila Deshmukh.

Justice Dere, however, recused from hearing the plea without assigning any reason. The petition will now be placed before another bench.

The activist, in his petition filed through advocate Satyanarayanan R, said his case stands on par with that of Sudha Bharadwaj, who was granted default bail by the high court.

"The only distinguishing factor is that while the applicant (Ferreira) filed the default bail application (in the lower court) on the 94th day, co-accused Sudha Bharadwaj filed it on the 91st day," the plea stated.

The High Court, while granting default bail to Ms. Bharadwaj, held that the Pune Sessions Court, that had granted extension of time to the Pune police for filing the charge sheet after the mandatory 90 days period for the same was over, did not have the jurisdiction to do so.

"The benefits of this finding needs to be extended to this applicant (Ferreira) as well. Thus, if the special court order is held to be without jurisdiction, then the benefit accorded to Sudha Bharadwaj ought to be extended to the present applicant too," the petition said. The High Court, while rejecting to grant default bail in December 2021 to the other eight accused, had held that they had not exercised their right to seek default bail in time.

It had observed that while Ms. Bharadwaj had filed a plea before the Pune court seeking default bail as soon as the 90 days period for filing the chargesheet ended, these eight accused had delayed filing their applications.

Mr. Ferreira was arrested in August 2018 and booked under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for waging war against the nation, being a member of a banned terror outfit CPI (Maoist), and propagating Maoist ideology.

As per his plea, in September 2018 Mr. Ferreira filed an application seeking default bail before the special court in Pune.

In June 2019, a common application was filed by Mr. Ferreira and eight other accused in the case for default bail on the ground that the special court in Pune did not have the jurisdiction to take cognisance of the chargesheet filed by the Pune police, which was initially probing the case.

In September 2019, this common application was rejected by the court. The nine accused then approached the Bombay High Court. In December 2021, the High Court granted default bail only to Ms. Bharadwaj, but rejected the pleas of the others.

The accused then filed a review petition which was also rejected by the high court this year. Following this, Mr. Ferreira filed a petition seeking default bail.

The case relates to alleged inflammatory speeches delivered at the Elgar Parishad conclave, held at Shaniwarwada in Pune on December 31, 2017, which the police claimed triggered violence the next day near the Koregaon-Bhima war memorial located on the city's outskirts. The Pune Police, which probed the case before it was transferred to the National Investigation Agency (NIA), claimed the conclave was backed by Maoists.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.