Elgar case | Bombay High Court seeks NIA’s reply on Gautam Navlakha’s bail plea

Navlakha had sought statutory or default bail before the special court on the ground that he had been in custody for over 90 days, but the prosecution had failed to file a charge sheet in the case within this period

Updated - September 04, 2020 06:07 pm IST - Mumbai

Gautam Navlakha surrendering before the National Investigation Agency in New Delhi in April.

Gautam Navlakha surrendering before the National Investigation Agency in New Delhi in April.

The Bombay High Court on Friday issued a notice to the National Investigation Agency (NIA), seeking its response to a bail plea filed by activist Gautam Navlakha, an accused in the Elgar Parishad-alleged Maoist links case.

A bench of Justices SS Shinde and MS Karnik directed the NIA to file its reply by September 15.

The bench was hearing a plea filed by Navlakha, challenging a special court order of July 12 this year that rejected his plea for statutory bail.

Navlakha had sought statutory or default bail before the special court on the ground that he had been in custody for over 90 days, but the prosecution had failed to file a charge sheet in the case within this period.

Also read: Delhi High Court seeks NIA’s response on Gautam Navlakha’s bail plea

The NIA, however, had argued that his plea was not maintainable.

It had also sought an extension for filing of chargehseet and the special court had at the time accepted the NIA’s plea seeking extension of 90 to 180 days to file the charge sheet against Navlakha and his co-accused, activist Dr. Anand Teltumbde.

Navlakha, lodged in Navi Mumbai’s Taloja jail, had surrendered before the NIA on April 14 this year .

Between August 29 and October 1 in 2018, Navlakha had been kept under house arrest.

According to police, the activists had made inflammatory speeches and provocative statements at the Elgar Parishad meet held in Pune on December 31, 2017, which it said triggered violence the next day at Koregaon Bhima in the district. The police also alleged that they were active members of banned Maoist groups.

The case was later transferred to the NIA.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.