Names not removed from electoral rolls based on draft NRC, ECI tells SC

Court directs ECI to furnish details of names included in the electoral rolls on January 1, 2017, 2018 and 2019 in the State.

March 13, 2019 12:59 am | Updated 03:15 pm IST - NEW DELHI

The court has asked the Election Commission to file an affidavit by March 28.

The court has asked the Election Commission to file an affidavit by March 28.

The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that names have not been deleted from the Assam electoral rolls on the basis of exclusion from the draft National Register of Citizens (NRC), which was published in July last.

However, a Bench led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi was not satisfied.

“But a question looms large in the light of the preparation of the final NRC, to be published on July 31, 2019. What would happen to those who do not appear there but are included in the electoral rolls?” Chief Justice Gogoi asked the poll body.

The court directed the ECI to furnish details of the names included in the electoral rolls on January 1, 2017, 2018 and 2019 in Assam.

Seeks affidavit

The Bench quizzed the ECI secretary, who was present in court, on electors in each constituency in Assam, addition and deletion. The court wanted an affidavit by March 28.

The Supreme Court had asked the ECI secretary to appear before it on March 12 in connection with a PIL petition filed by Assam-based residents Gopal Seth and Susanta Sen alleging that several categories of persons were deprived of voting rights ahead of the Lok Sabha polls.

They claimed that one category included persons whose names figured in the draft NRC but not in the voter list. In another category, persons whose names were deleted from the voter list appeared in the draft NRC published on July 30, 2018. The petition claimed these people voted in the 2014 Lok Sabha election.

The plea also submitted that there were people whose names were not included in the complete draft NRC, but they subsequently filed claims for inclusion. They had voted in the earlier Lok Sabha election and were waiting for inclusion of their names.

The third category of people were those declared foreigners by the foreigners’ tribunal as well as by the Guwahati High Court; the court order was stayed by the Supreme Court.

The petition said the fourth category comprised those already declared foreigners by the tribunal; this was set aside by the Supreme Court. However, their names had been deleted from the voters list pursuant to the order of the tribunal.

In the fifth category were those whose names had not been included in the draft NRC but their family members were included; these had filed a claim for inclusion of their names.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.