ED summons Bharti Wal-Mart officials

Wal-Mart U.S. invested a huge sum in multi-brand retail in 2010 violating the ban, says petition

March 02, 2013 03:40 am | Updated November 17, 2021 04:45 am IST - CHENNAI:

The Enforcement Directorate has summoned Bharti Wal-Mart officials to investigate charges that Wal-Mart, U.S., had illegally made a huge investment in multi-brand retail in India during March-April 2010.

On Friday, the Directorate informed the Madras High Court that it had summoned the officials to record their statements. A petition filed in the public interest by the Federation of Tamil Nadu Traders’ Association came up before a Division Bench of Justices R. Banumathi and K.K. Sasidharan.

The petitioner alleged that certain companies had violated the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and its regulations and made FDI three years ago. Wal-Mart, U.S., had invested Rs. 456 crore in multi-brand retail, violating the ban on FDI in the sector at that time. If left unchecked, foreign entities and multinational companies could make similar investments in sensitive sectors where FDI was banned. When the matter came up for further hearing, Additional Solicitor General P. Wilson filed an affidavit by the Deputy Director of the Enforcement Directorate, Rajeshwar Singh, who said the agency would take some more time to conclude its investigation as it was examining the documents received from the companies and government departments. A summons under FEMA was issued to officials of Bharti Wal-Mart Ltd. to record their statements and explanations.

The relevant material had been sought from Cedar Support Services Ltd., Bharti Wal-Mart Pvt. Ltd., Bharti Venture Ltd. and Bharti Retail Ltd. The Directorate was investigating the receipt of Rs. 455.80 crore in FDI by Cedar and Rs. 139.33 crore by Bharti Wal-Mart. It was probing whether the FDI conformed to Section 6 (3) (b) of FEMA, read with the Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by a person resident outside India) Regulations, 2000.

The Bench adjourned the matter by four weeks.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.