Defence Ministry spent ₹7.85 crore on legal fee

Earns Supreme Court’s ire for excessive litigation.

July 15, 2019 12:29 am | Updated 12:29 am IST - NEW DELHI

The Army spent ₹11.5 lakh while the Navy ₹69 lakh  between 2013-14 to 2017-18.

The Army spent ₹11.5 lakh while the Navy ₹69 lakh between 2013-14 to 2017-18.

While the debate continues over taxing disability pension for military personnel and assurances by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to look into the matter, information provided under the Right to Information (RTI) Act shows that between 2013 and July 2018, the Defence Ministry paid about ₹7.85 crore as fee to the government counsel for various cases pending against military personnel in the Supreme Court, the High Courts and the Armed Forces Tribunals (AFTs).

Most pricey

Of the three services, the IAF had the highest number of cases at 2,683 on which a little over ₹7 crore was spent on legal fees, show information obtained through the RTI query filed by advocate Brajesh Singh in August last.

The Army spent about ₹11.5 lakh, while the Navy about ₹69 lakh for cases in North India between 2013-14 and 2017-18.

The Defence Ministry has often faced criticism for spending money on lawyers to appeal against soldiers who approached the AFTs for disability benefits or pension and was even pulled up by the Supreme Court on several occasions for excessive litigation.

Last year, the Ministry withdrew several appeals against disability and as of now, 26 appeals were pending against grant of disability pension in the Supreme Court, Mr. Singh said in a written reply in Parliament last week. Last year, the Ministry withdrew 60 civil appeals in the apex court, of which 17 were for disability pension.

In 2015, a committee was constituted to “look into solutions for reducing litigation concerning the Defence Ministry and put in place an efficient mechanism to redress grievances related to service and pension matters.” In a notification dated June 24, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) under the Finance Ministry said “such tax exemption will be available only to armed forces personnel who have been invalidated from service on account of bodily disability attributable to or aggravated by such service and not to personnel who have been retired on superannuation or otherwise.” Mr. Singh recently told Parliament he had directed officials to get details from the Finance Ministry.

After the CBDT notification, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman put out an unsigned note of the Army which said some “unscrupulous personnel” were exploiting the disability benefits.

Parts of the CBDT note were later put out on Twitter by the Army’s Additional Director-General of Public Information (ADG-PI).

Following this, the Army came in for sharp criticism from the veteran community on social media over its stand.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.