Gujarat court directs removal of Narendra Modi’s name from civil suit

Damages were sought for the gruesome killing of four British citizens during the 2002 riots.

September 05, 2020 10:49 pm | Updated September 06, 2020 04:39 am IST - AHMEDABAD:

Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi

A local court in Gujarat on Saturday directed that the name of Prime Minister Narendra Modi be deleted from a civil suit seeking damages for the gruesome killing of four British citizens during the 2002 riots.

Four British nationals were killed in a rioting incident in Sabarkantha district of north Gujarat during the communal riots in 2002.

The local court in its order held that there was no substantive material to link the defendant (Narendra Modi) in his personal or official capacity with the incident, and termed the allegations made in the civil suit as “vague and general” in nature.

Principal senior civil judge in Prantij town court Suresh Gadhavi pronounced the order directing removal of the name of Narendra Modi, who was the then Chief Minister of the State, along with former IPS officers K. Chakravarty, Amitabh Pathak and Ashok Narayan, whose names also were also mentioned as defendants in the civil suit filed by the relatives of the deceased.

The civil suit was filed 2004 by Sameema Dawood, a British national, and others, in the local court against Mr. Modi, then minister of State for Home Gordhan Zadaphia and 12 others, seeking ₹20 crore as damage “on account of violence in the State wherein the relatives of the plaintiffs are alleged to have been killed…”

During the 2002 communal riots, British nationals Saeed Dawood, Shakeel Dawood and Mohammed Aswat were killed by a mob on National Highway 8 on February 28, 2002 while they were returning from Rajasthan. Three of them were killed on the spot while the dead body of the fourth was never found and he was presumed dead after seven years.

The court passed the order on Saturday after a lawyer S.S. Shah moved an application on behalf of Mr. Modi, contending that his name as a defendant was not legally sustainable in the suit.

In 2015, a special designated trial court had acquitted all the six accused for want of evidence linking them with the crime. This sensational rioting case was one of the nine cases probed by the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team and its trial was held in special designated court under the monitoring of the apex court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.