CBI files cases against Srinagar AAI officials

They are accused of causing loss of ₹6.33 cr to the exchequer

October 27, 2019 03:22 am | Updated 03:22 am IST - New Delhi

CHENNAI/TAMILNADU-17/05/2013- The view of  new international terminal at the Chennai airport .  Photo: M_Srinath

CHENNAI/TAMILNADU-17/05/2013- The view of new international terminal at the Chennai airport . Photo: M_Srinath

The Central Bureau of Investigation has registered two cases against some Airports Authority of India (AAI) employees posted at the Srinagar international airport in Jammu and Kashmir for alleged corruption in the allotment of business spaces to two private companies.

In the first case, those named are Praveen Kumar Kanojia, the then manager (commercial), and Aijaz Abdullah, junior assistant (electric), who is currently attached to the commercial section, besides unknown officials. Mumbai-based P.K. Global Private Limited’s vice-president Virendra Aggrawal and unknown company employees have also been arraigned.

The agency alleges that the AAI officials conspired with the owner of P.K. Global Private Limited, caused wrongful gain to the company and themselves, and corresponding loss to the exchequer to the tune of more than ₹6.33 crore.

According to the CBI, the officials had allotted outlets for running eateries, selling dry fruits, gift items, Kashmiri handicraft, shawls and other articles in a “highly cryptic” manner, without receiving the relevant documents as mentioned in the tender. The necessary documentation process was also not followed.

The area allotted for seven years to the company for running the outlets was on the higher side, compared to the terms and conditions. The allotment was of 488 sq m, with a minimum monthly guarantee of ₹38.54 lakh. It is alleged that the additional area allotted to the firm could have generated additional revenue.

Also, as alleged, the bank guarantee submitted by Global Trends was as per the tender conditions. The guarantee had to be given through a nationalised/scheduled bank, not from any cooperative bank. The accused officials knew about the irregularity, but accepted the guarantee for "some pecuniary advantage".

Only two notices had been sent to the company from July 2018 to August 2019 for the recovery of outstanding rent with applicable interest. Besides, no other bill on account of rent payment had been raised from October 2018 onward. No effort was made by the AAI officials to initiate recovery proceedings and get the allotted space vacated, the FIR alleges.

The second case also names the same AAI officials, accusing them of causing a loss of about ₹48 lakh to the exchequer. They allegedly conspired with the owner of Golden Chariot Hospitality Services Private Limited and provided it space for operating an executive lounge for five years.

The tender requirements include security deposit of ₹81.34 lakh in the form of bank guarantee and ₹13.55 lakh monthly rent. It is alleged that the company did not pay the decided rent, due to which the bank guarantee was encashed. The officials allegedly did not make any effort to recover the dues.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.