Bombay High Court allows Malegaon victim to intervene in plea by Prasad Purohit

A Dvision Bench allowed the intervention on hearing the criminal interim application filed by Nisar Ahmed Haji Sayyed Bilal, a victim and father of a man who died in the blast along with five others

November 27, 2020 12:43 pm | Updated 12:47 pm IST - Mumbai

Lt Col Prasad Purohit. File photo.

Lt Col Prasad Purohit. File photo.

The Bombay High Court on Thursday allowed 2008 Malegaon bomb blast victim to intervene in plea filed by accused Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit challenging sanction to prosecute him.

A Division Bench of Justices S.S. Shinde and M.S. Karnik allowed the intervention on hearing the criminal interim application filed by Nisar Ahmed Haji Sayyed Bilal , a victim and father of a man who died in the blast along with five others.

Former Additional Solicitor General of India B.A. Desai representing Mr. Bilal had earlier sought permission to intervene in the case. He said he has filed for an intervention during the trial and matters before the Supreme Court in the case.

Advocate Neela Gokhale appearing for Mr. Purohit had previously opposed the application and said the plea filed by Mr. Purohit is only challenging the sanction to prosecute him and that his role in the case is restricted to him discharging his official duties as an Army officer. Therefore the intervention application should not be allowed.

Giving the recent account of the Malegaon trial, the National Investigation Agency's counsel Sandesh Patil had said, out of 400 witnesses, 140 have been examined and that the trial was stalled because the presiding judge retired and the new judge has not been able to take charge because of COVID 19. However the trial resumed on November 26 and will be heard in December on a day to day basis.

The matter will now be heard on December 3.

Mr. Purohit is out on bail but has been charged with murder, voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons, promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc, and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony on him, relevant sections under The Arms Act, The Indian Explosive Substance Act, and Unlawful Activities Prevention Act.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.