Beant Singh killing: SC gives two weeks to govt. to decide on mercy plea of convict

Balwant Singh Rajoana’s plea for Presidential mercy has been hanging in limbo despite the government having decided in 2019 to spare his life in commemoration of the 550th birth anniversary of Guru Nanak Dev Ji.

January 25, 2021 02:42 pm | Updated 02:59 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

Balwant Singh Rajoana

Balwant Singh Rajoana

The government told the Supreme Court on Monday that a decision on the mercy plea of Balwant Singh Rajoana, in jail for 26 years for the assassination of former Punjab Chief Minister Beant Singh, would have some “some repercussions” now.

Appearing before a Bench led by Chief Justice of India Sharad A. Bobde, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for the Centre, sought three weeks’ time.

“Why three weeks? What are you doing? You said you will take a decision before Republic Day...” Chief Justice Bobde asked Mr. Mehta.

“What are they doing? It has been 26 years of jail for him (Balwant Singh)... Your Lordships have given them (government) a long rope,” senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, for Balwant Singh, objected to Mr. Mehta’s submissions.

“He is in jail for 26 years, yes, but he is in jail for the assassination of a former Chief Minister of Punjab,” Mr. Mehta responded.

The Solicitor General said the government was “examining the petition”.

“Any decision, either way, may have some repercussions now,” Mr. Mehta stressed.

The court finally gave the government two weeks.

Balwant Singh’s plea for Presidential mercy has been hanging in limbo despite the government having decided over a year ago, in 2019, to spare his life in commemoration of the 550th birth anniversary of Guru Nanak Dev Ji.

In a petition to the Supreme Court from his jail cell, Balwant Singh has said his repeated pleas to the government about the fate of the mercy plea was met with silence. He called the delay “inexplicable”. The mercy petition was filed in 2012.

The court said the law was settled that once government decided to recommend a Presidential pardon for a condemned man, the pendency of appeals in the Supreme Court of his co-accused could not delay the process initiated under Article 72 (Presidential pardon) of the Constitution.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.