Babri Masjid demolition case | Supreme Court fixes August 31 as new deadline for judgement

CBI court is trying senior BJP leaders accused of conspiracy leading to demolition of the structure

May 08, 2020 06:45 pm | Updated May 09, 2020 01:06 am IST - New Delhi

BABRI MASJID. File

BABRI MASJID. File

The Supreme Court on Friday directed a CBI court trying senior BJP leaders for the Babri Masjid demolition to deliver the judgment by August 31, 2020.

Prominent BJP and Sangh Parivar leaders like L.K. Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi and Uma Bharti are accused of criminal conspiracy leading to the demolition of the 16th century Babri mosque by kar sevaks in Ayodhya on December 6, 1992.

A Bench led by Justice Rohinton F. Nariman took cognisance of a letter from CBI judge S.K. Yadav through videoconferencing, and said, “We are cognisant of the fact that Shri Yadav is making all efforts in order that the trial reaches a just conclusion. However, given the original time frame and the extended time frame, the effort must now be to complete the proceedings and deliver judgment latest by August 31, 2020.”

Extended deadline

The Bench said Mr. Yadav should take advantage of videoconferencing to complete the evidence in the trial and wind up the case within the slotted time.

Also read: What is the Babri Masjid case all about?

In July last year , the Supreme court had asked the Uttar Pradesh government to give an extension of tenure to Judge Yadav, who was scheduled to retire on September 30, so that he could complete the trial in the over 25-year-old cases. The top court had also extended the two-year deadline given to the trial judge.

In 2017, the top court had invoked the maxim, ‘Let justice be done though the heavens fall,’ to flex its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to bring the cases to justice.

Joint trial

The Supreme court had transferred the Rae Bareilly case, languishing in a Magistrate court, to the CBI Court in Lucknow for a joint trial. It had ordered the Lucknow CBI Judge to hold day-to-day trial and pronounce the judgment in two years. It had forbade the transfer of the judge and also adjournments. Any grievances, the Bench had said, should be addressed to the Supreme Court. Its directions had to be complied with in letter and spirit, the court cautioned.

The Rae Bareilly case accuses the BJP and Sangh Parivar leaders of having given speeches that promoted enmity and threatened the nation’s integrity.

The Lucknow case, investigated by the CBI, is against “lakhs of unknown kar sevaks” and deals with the actual act of demolition and violence. With the clubbing of the cases and revival of the conspiracy charge, the accused leaders would be tried under the composite chargesheet filed by the CBI on October 5, 1993.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.