RTC staff want pre-merger benefits to continue

Working panel didn’t consider our views, say union leaders

January 19, 2020 10:13 pm | Updated 10:13 pm IST - VIJAYAWADA

One and a half month after celebrating the merger of the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) with the government, a long-standing demand of the corporation’s Employees Union (EU), the latter is gearing up for a showdown with the management.

Leaders of the APSRTC EU are upset over the management’s decision to scrap the existing facilities to the employees like the Staff Retirement Benefit Scheme (SRBS), Staff Benevolent Trust (SBT), medical and bus pass facilities.

“Merger should not mean depriving the employees of the existing facilities. We expect additional benefits,” said P. Damodar Rao, general secretary of EU.

Since dissolution of the corporation is not possible due to technical issues, the Jagan Mohan Reddy government shifted its 51,488 staff to a newly-created Public Transport Department (PTD) and constituted a seven-member working committee to study all aspects of the merger and suggest the best options for merger.

Board meeting

The committee was represented by Additional Secretary (Finance) Ch. V.N. Malleswara Rao, Additional Secretary (General Administration) V. Siva Sankara Rao, Additional Secretary (Law) S. Venkateswara Rao, Deputy Financial Advisor (Transport and Roads & Buildings) Ch. Appala Seshu and Assistant Secretary (Transport and Roads & Buildings) Ch. Venkateswara Rao.

The EU leaders are unhappy with the fact that the committee has not taken any of their views and suggestions into consideration and has given its report that recommends repeal of all the old facilities given to the employees and implementation of the only ones that the government employees have. “The RTC Board is scheduled to meet on Monday and make an official announcement on the issue after the meeting. We want the board members to withdraw their decision or else the employees will be forced to resort to an agitation,” said Y.V. Rao, president of the EU.

The leaders wanted representation to a union member in the board.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.