In report submitted to court, CBI says Azad killing was not a fake encounter

March 17, 2012 03:28 am | Updated 03:41 am IST - NEW DELHI:

The Central Bureau of Investigation told the Supreme Court on Friday that the killings of Cherukuri Rajkumar alias Azad, spokesperson of the Communist Party of India (Maoist), and journalist Hemchandra Pandey by the Andhra Pradesh police on the night of July 1, 2010 were not a fake encounter as alleged in the petitions filed in the court.

The CBI made the submission in its final investigation report filed before a Bench of Justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Desai.

After going through the report, Justice Alam told counsel Prashant Bhushan: “The CBI has done a thorough and painful investigation, which do not confirm your suspicion [of a fake encounter]. We will not sit in [on] appeal over the final investigation report.”

Additional Solicitor-General Harin Raval opposed giving a copy of the report to the petitioners, arguing that it would affect the trial. Senior counsel Altaf Ahmed, appearing for Andhra Pradesh, also took a similar line.

But Mr. Bhushan said that right from the beginning, Home Minister P. Chidambaram was saying that it was not a fake encounter, and the investigation seemed to have supported his statement. If it was a genuine encounter and no offence was committed, why the CBI should oppose giving a copy of the report to the petitioners, he asked.

Justice Alam told Mr. Bhushan that the CBI had conducted a thorough probe and arranged all the events sequentially. When Mr. Bhushan insisted on a copy of the report, the Bench said he would be permitted to inspect it in the Registry. The Bench listed the matter for further hearing on April 13.

In April 2011, the court ordered a CBI probe into the killings and asked the agency to submit a report.

According to the petitioners, the post-mortem reports and a fact-finding work carried out by the Coordination of Democratic Rights Organisations indicated that it was not a genuine encounter, and that Azad and Pandey were killed in blatant violation of their rights under Articles 14 and 21. Azad was carrying a letter from Swami Agnivesh for peace talks when he, along with Pandey, was taken into custody.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.