All you need to know about Section 66A of the IT Act

What Section 66A says:

"Any person who sends, by means of a computer resource or a communication device

(a) any information that is grossly offensive or has menacing character; or

(b) any information which he knows to be false, but for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will, persistently by making use of such computer resource or a communication device,

(c) any electronic mail or electronic mail message for the purpose of causing annoyance or inconvenience or to deceive or to mislead the addressee or recipient about the origin of such messages, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine."

Section 66A provides punishment for sending offensive messages through communication services.

These messages may be any information created, transmitted or received on a computer system, resource or device including attachments in the form of...

• Text

• Images

• Audio

• Video

• Any other electronic record which may be transmitted with the message

The law targets messages that...

• Are grossly offensive or menacing

• Proffer false information intending to cause annoyance, inconvenience, intimidation, insult, obstruction, etc.,

• Are intended at deceiving the addressee about the origin of the message

The law was amended in 2008 and received Presidential assent on February 5, 2009.



SC strikes down 'draconian' Section 66A

Section 66A of the Information Technology Act is unconstitutional in its entirety, the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday striking down a “draconian” provision that had led to the arrests of many people for posting content deemed to be “allegedly objectionable” on the Internet.


Victory for team of young lawyers, activists

'Liberty of speech, expression cardinal concepts of paramount significance in a democracy


Three MPs stand vindicated

It was one of the seven Bills cleared by the Lok Sabha in seven minutes on the penultimate day, and passed by the Rajya Sabha the following day without discussion.


What the experts said on live chat

Three eminent panellists shared their views and answered questions from readers on the verdict.


Free speech Ver.2.0

The Supreme Court has paved the way for thoughtful jurisprudence in the age of the Internet


Centre plans security guidelines

A new, improved guidelines could come if security establishments demand that the IT Act be strengthened


AAP, Left parties welcome verdict

Court has sent a message to States such as West Bengal that they cannot suppress dissent, says CPI(M)

Section 66A provides punishment for sending offensive messages through communication services. > Read more
Section 66A certainly does not engage in the balancing required to pursue the objective of preventing criminal intimidation and danger on social media. > Read more
What the outcry over Section 66A of the IT Act misses is the need for a mechanism to prevent arrests on flimsy interpretations of criminal law provisions. > Read more
All you need to know about Sec 66A

An unreasonable restriction

Saving free speech from the police

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face, forever.” > Read more
  Like it or not, comment is not free

Here are some of the views posted by Facebook users, most of whom seemed to feel 66A curbs free speech rather than genuinely fight cyber crime. > Read more
    Does Section 66A curb or safeguard social media?

Our code of editorial values

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Nov 25, 2021 10:49:21 AM |

Next Story