Adipurush kicks off political storm; Chhattisgarh ready to ban film on public demand

AAP says BJP must apologise for offending Hindus as its leaders “blessed” film; Shiv Sena (UBT) slams language; lone BJP voice seeks Censor Board review

Updated - June 18, 2023 09:33 am IST - NEW DELHI

A seat reserved for Lord Hanuman in a theatre where Prabhas-starrer Adipurush was screened in Vijayawada on June 16, 2023.

A seat reserved for Lord Hanuman in a theatre where Prabhas-starrer Adipurush was screened in Vijayawada on June 16, 2023. | Photo Credit: G.N. Rao

Adipurush, the latest film based on the Ramayana, has kicked off a political storm, with many leaders across the ideological spectrum — from the Congress and the Aam Aadmi Party to the Shiv Sena (UBT) and even a lone voice from the BJP — objecting to its portrayal of Hanuman.

Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel announced that the State government would consider banning the film, if the public demanded it.

The film, written by Manoj Muntashir Shukla and released on Friday, is under fire for its dialogues and special effects, with critics finding Hanuman’s dialogues in the Lanka Dahan sequence particularly offensive.

Mr. Baghel told presspersons in Raipur that the film was an attempt to tarnish the image of Lord Ram and Lord Hanuman.

“The government will think about it [a ban] if people raise a demand,” he said, alleging that the film was just another step in transforming the image of Lord Hanuman. “We have seen the gentle faces of Lord Ram and Lord Hanuman drenched in devotion, but from the past few years, an attempt is being made to change this image,” he said.

He said the language used in the film was “indecent”, adding that Lord Ram has always been known as “Maryada Purushottam”, or the upholder of morality.

Congress spokesperson Supriya Shrinate panned the film for its use of “vulgar language” and attempt to promote the “business of religion”.

The film, she said, does not compare to the Ramayana television series produced by Ramanand Sagar in the late 1980s. Former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi had said the series ignited the hearts and minds of millions of viewers, and communicated the great culture, tradition and moral values of India. “The author of that Ramayana was Ramanand Sagar, who did not hurt the feelings of crores of people with tapori (street) language, but imprinted a sweet, gentle and charming image of Siya Ram in the minds and hearts of society,” she said in a tweet.

Delhi BJP spokesperson Praveen Shankhar Kapoor was the lone voice from the ruling party to protest against the film. He urged Information and Broadcasting Minister Anurag Thakur to re-examine the “controversial scenes and dialogues”.

Adipurush is being opposed everywhere. Hence it is requested that its controversial scenes and dialogues be re-examined. The censor Board should temporarily suspend its censor certificate and ban its screening till it is reviewed again,” Mr. Kapoor said

‘BJP must apologise’

Joining the chorus, the Aam Aadmi Party MP Sanjay Singh also denounced the film and demanded an apology from Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP leaders for “offending the Hindu community”. He further slammed several BJP Chief Ministers for their involvement in the film and giving it their “blessings”. Addressing BJP supporters, Mr. Singh said that BJP leaders are associated with the film, and it should cause them to reflect on the kind of individuals they were.

Calling for accountability, Mr. Singh said, “BJP has insulted Hindu religion and society through the offensive portrayal of Hindu deities and the use of derogatory language in the movie. For this, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, BJP President J.P. Nadda, and all the BJP leaders who have blessed this offensive movie should apologise to the people of the country.”

‘Pedestrian dialogues’

Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi said that the film’s writer and director should apologise to the country for “the pedestrian dialogues written for the movie, especially for Lord Hanuman”.

“It hurts every Indian’s sensibility to see the kind of language being attributed to our revered gods in the name of entertainment. You make a movie on ‘Maryada Purushottam’ Ram and cross all boundaries of Maryada (dignity) for quick box office success is unacceptable,” she said in a tweet.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.