Review plea in SC against scrapping of NEET

August 05, 2013 08:02 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 11:16 pm IST - New Delhi

NEW DELHI, 064/05/2013 : Prashant Bhushan, petitioner in the coal block allocation case briefing the media after the CBI filed a nine page affidavit, at the Supreme Court,  in New Delhi on 06/05/2013.  Photo: V_Sudershan

NEW DELHI, 064/05/2013 : Prashant Bhushan, petitioner in the coal block allocation case briefing the media after the CBI filed a nine page affidavit, at the Supreme Court, in New Delhi on 06/05/2013. Photo: V_Sudershan

A petition was filed in the Supreme Court on Monday seeking a review of its judgement scrapping the single common entrance test (NEET) for admissions to MBBS, BDS and post-graduate courses in all medical colleges.

The plea filed by ‘Sankalp’, a non-governmental organisation, through lawyer Prashant Bhushan, has sought a review of the July 18 majority (2-1) verdict of the apex court that had quashed the notifications for National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) on the ground that it violated the rights of state and private institutions to administer such institutions.

Seeking the review on the grounds including that of rampant corruption in the absence of NEET, the plea said the verdict also needed to be re-looked as there was “no discussion at all among the judges before delivering it, which is apparent from the minority judgement itself.”

“In fact, in the very second para of the judgement, it has been observed ‘as the learned Chief Justice is to retire within a few days, I have to be quick and therefore, also short. Prior to preparation of our draft judgements, we had no discussion on the subject due to paucity of time...’ it is respectfully submitted that this observation in the minority judgement makes it all the more necessary that the aforesaid judgement is reviewed,” it said.

The judgement quashing the NEET was delivered by a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Altamas Kabir (now retired) by a 2-1 division.

The view of the then CJI was shared by Justice Vikramjit Sen, while Justice A.R. Dave had dissented and upheld the NEET saying the policy was “legal” as it would stop corrupt practice which enabled undeserving students to get admissions by paying huge capitation fees or donations.

“In fact, one of the main considerations of having one common entrance test conducted by Medical Council of India is to check the malaise of money-making business in the admission process by selling their seats for crores, which has been going on for last so many years in private colleges,” it said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.