Rajiv assassination case convict seeks to know ‘real conspirators’ behind killing

Supreme Court seeks response from CBI

December 14, 2016 12:47 pm | Updated 02:37 pm IST

A.G. Perarivalan. File photo: C. Venkatachalapathy

A.G. Perarivalan. File photo: C. Venkatachalapathy

Was there a ‘larger conspiracy’ behind the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi? Who were the ‘real conspirators’? These are the questions the Supreme Court wants the CBI to respond to. The queries came from one of the convicts in the case, A.G. Perarivalan.

A Bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and L. Nageshwara Rao on Wednesday issued notice to the premier investigating agency asking why they did not probe whether there was a larger conspiracy at work behind the assassination in 1991 despite an order from a TADA court in Chennai.

The TADA court had passed the order on a petition by A.G. Perarivalan for a direction to CBI to probe the ‘leftout area’ of the earlier investigation into the assassination.

“What is the further investigation required?” Justice Gogoi asked.

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for Perarivalan, replied that further probe is indeed required.

“What was followed by the CBI was a ‘Boom Theory’. That is there is a death, followed by an investigation into the boom and trial focusing on the boom. But they have not gone into whether there was a larger conspiracy... It is this question which requires investigation,” Mr. Dhavan submitted.

“So the boom is over, the trial is over and you say there is still something more to it?” Justice Gogoi asked.

“Yes, the TADA court said there is more to it. It asked the CBI to investigate who the real conspirators were,” Mr. Dhavan responded.

The court then ordered the issue of notice, seeking a response from the CBI.

Perarivalan had, in the lower courts, wanted the entire case dairies pertaining to the CBI (Special Investigation Team) and its Multi Disciplinary Monitoring Agency (MDMA), which probed the case.

He had referred to the Jain Commission of Inquiry report, which had formed the basis for the court’s decision for a further probe to identify the role of individuals to uncover the larger conspiracy in the assassination.

Perarivalan had contended that neither the SIT nor the MDMA had proceeded with the probe in a proper perspective to bring the accused to book as several top people were ‘involved’.

He had further alleged that the CBI/MDMA, entrusted with the primary task to go into the facts of the involvement of foreign hand beyond the LTTE, has not done its work properly.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.