One more PIL in SC against NJAC Bill

August 19, 2014 05:11 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 05:43 pm IST - New Delhi

A file picture of Supreme Court in New Delhi. Photo: Rajeev Bhatt.

A file picture of Supreme Court in New Delhi. Photo: Rajeev Bhatt.

The Supreme Court has been moved contending that the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) and the Constitution Amendment Bills replacing the collegium system of appointment of judges violated the basic structure of the Constitution and should be struck down as unconstitutional.

Former Additional Solicitor General Bishwajit Bhattacharya in his public interest writ petition said it was manifest that the two bills of 2014 were ultra vires the basis structure of the Constitution as the Doctrine of separation of power and the independence of the judiciary were basic immutable features of India’s Constitution.

The petitioner pointed out that the NJAC would recommend for appointment the senior-most Judge of the Supreme Court as the Chief Justice of India “if he is considered fit” to hold office. He said “the words “considered fit’ opens up the possibility of superseding the senior-most Judge of the Supreme Court and preventing him/her from becoming the next Chief Justice of India. This would severely compromise with the independence of the judiciary. All that is required for any two members (of the 6) of the NJAC, even two non judge members, is to say no (declare the senior most Judge of the Supreme Court ‘unfit’) and the senior most Judge of the Supreme Court would stand superseded. That would draw a curtain on India’s democracy.”

He said “the design of the executive and the legislature is writ large: to switch back to the days of supersession of former Justices Shelat, Grover and Hegde. A combined reading of Articles 124, 127, 128, 217, and 222 reflects that it is the Chief Justice of India who ensures the independence of the Judiciary by being completely involved in every appointment of Supreme Court Judges and High court Judges and in every transfer of Judges from one High Court to another. This power is now being shifted to the NJAC and the very possibility of the CJI along with two senior-most Judges of SC being vetoed by the executive would be destructive of the independence of the Judiciary and the doctrine of separation of power, both basic features of India’s Constitution.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.