MGNREGS gets mixed review from World Bank

Updated - November 17, 2021 02:46 am IST

Published - May 22, 2011 10:29 am IST - New Delhi

In this March 2011 photo, members working under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) stage a protest demanding more jobs and wage hike, in Bangalore. Photo: K. Murali Kumar

In this March 2011 photo, members working under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) stage a protest demanding more jobs and wage hike, in Bangalore. Photo: K. Murali Kumar

The government’s flagship rural job guarantee scheme is innovative and has achieved quite high coverage but faces challenges like uneven implementation across states and “some evidence” of leakage of funds, a new World Bank report says.

The study ‘Social Protection for a Changing India’ also says ensuring higher degree of awareness among people about the process of applying for work under the scheme and a strong monitoring and evaluation system will help in more successful implementation of the programme.

The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme has significantly higher coverage compared to previous public works programmes and “impressive inclusion” of scheduled castes (31 per cent), scheduled tribes (25 per cent) and women (50 per cent), it said, adding that MGNREGA serves as a model for future reforms in other safety net programmes.

But the report also pointed to “uneven implementation” of MGNREGA across States. While about 90 per cent rural households reaped benefits of the scheme in Rajasthan and the coverage was between 60 to 80 per cent in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, the percentage was less than 20 per cent in States like Punjab, Haryana, Kerala and Gujarat.

The report, the first comprehensive review of India’s anti-poverty initiatives which was started in 2004 after a request from the Planning Commission, used data from ministries, national sample surveys and World Bank studies.

It said there is “widespread unmet demand” for work and employment generated is still less than the 100-day guarantee.

“Localised studies also point to some evidence of leakage of funds and delay in fund transfers to panchayats,” World Bank lead economist of social protection, John Blomquist says.

According to the report, field studies report ways through which accountability mechanisms are being subverted, including through fudged muster rolls, misuse of job cards and account passbooks.

“In addition, the capacity of PRIs (Panchayati Raj Institutions) to conduct their intended functions is very weak,” it said. A range of functions - including planning, execution and monitoring - are expected to be performed by them but it is a difficult challenge, the report says.

It also pointed out that field studies indicate “poor adherence to transparency safeguards”.

“In practice, unavailable and fudged master rolls continue to be a serious issue. Job card entries are rarely made. In fact, job cards are not always in the possession of the household; instead the Sarpanch or other local official may hold it. The problems are exacerbated by low awareness of processes as well as high levels of illiteracy among MGNREG workers,” the report says.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.