India’s NSG membership not on Seoul meet agenda: China

June 20, 2016 03:06 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 05:10 am IST - Beijing

China on Monday said differences remain among NSG members over the inclusion of new countries and the issue was not even on the agenda of the grouping’s meeting in Seoul this week, a day after External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj asserted that Beijing was not opposing India’s entry.

“We have stressed that the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) is still divided about non-NPT countries’ entry into the NSG and under the current circumstances we hope that NSG will make thorough discussions to make a decision based on consultation,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying told a media briefing.

Answering questions about Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar’s visit here on June 16-17 and Ms. Swaraj’s remarks, Ms. Hua said India’s admission into NSG is not on the agenda of the Seoul meeting of the 48-member elite club to be held on June 24.

“As we understand the annual conference in Seoul this year also has no such topic. We understand that non-NPT countries are concerned about their entry into the NSG. But since NSG is still divided about the issue, it is still not mature to talk about the entry issue in the annual conference in Seoul,” she said.

“I want point out that the NSG agenda has never covered any issue concerning the non-NPT countries joining the NSG,” Ms. Hua asserted.

Her remarks came even as Ms. Swaraj on Sunday said India was confident of getting NSG membership this year.

“China is not opposing membership of India in NSG, it is only talking of criteria and procedure. I am hopeful that we would be able to convince China as well to support our entry to the NSG,” she told a press conference.

“I think that there is a consensus which is being made and I am sure that India will become the member of the NSG this year,” she had said.

Ms. Hua noted, “China maintains that NSG should have thorough discussion on the joining of the non-NPT countries in a way agreed by all parties, so as to make a decision based on agreement. This position is not directed against any country and applies to all non-NPT states.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.