Gujarat questions probe report on Ishrat Jehan

September 09, 2009 01:22 am | Updated November 17, 2021 06:54 am IST - GANDHINAGAR

Ishrat Jehan's mother, Shamima, brother Seikh Anwar and sister Musarrat display their family photo in Mumbai on Tuesday, after a press conference. Photo: Vivek Bendre

Ishrat Jehan's mother, Shamima, brother Seikh Anwar and sister Musarrat display their family photo in Mumbai on Tuesday, after a press conference. Photo: Vivek Bendre

The Gujarat government has questioned the inquiry report of Ahmedabad metropolitan magistrate S.P. Tamang, holding “fake” the encounter, which led to the killing of Ishrat Jehan and three others on the outskirts of Ahmedabad in June 2004.

Claiming that the encounter of the four alleged Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba operatives was carried out on the basis of information given by Central intelligence agencies, Health Minister Jaynarayan Vyas said the State government would challenge Mr. Tamang’s report in court.

Quoting from an affidavit filed in the Gujarat High Court by Under Secretary (Internal Security) in the Union Ministry of Home Affairs R.V.S. Mani, Mr. Vyas also questioned the metropolitan magistrate’s authority to hold the inquiry under Section 176 of the Cr.PC which he claimed was specifically meant for custodial deaths. Ishrat and the three others were killed in the encounter on the road and not in police custody. Therefore, the metropolitan magistrate had no jurisdiction to hold the inquiry, he said.

Pointing out that the High Court was already seized of the matter and had constituted a three-member special investigation team of top police officers for a fresh inquiry into the Ishrat encounter, Mr. Vyas said since the matter was sub judice, the metropolitan magistrate should not have made his inquiry report public.

Not given hearing

He said the principle of natural justice demanded that the accusedbe given a fair opportunity to present their side but Mr. Tamang had heard neither the accused police officials nor the State government.

It was intriguing that the entire investigation was completed and the report submitted in just 25 days after Mr. Tamang was asked by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate to look into the matter on August 12.

The State government was also not supplied with a certified copy of the report, before it was “leaked” to the media and made public. The report, however, was not binding on it, Mr. Vyas said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.